Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Diabetes Acceptance and Action Scale-Revised (DAAS-R) for Korean patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods The survey was conducted from September 1, 2021, to September 30, 2021, through a survey institution for patients diagnosed with diabetes who understood the purpose of the study and voluntarily agreed to participate. A total of 231 individuals with type 2 diabetes participated in this study. After performing forward and backward translations of the original version of the Diabetes Acceptance and Action Scale-Revised (DAAS-R) into Korean, its constructive validity (confirmatory factor analysis), concurrent validity and reliability were assessed. Concurrent validity was confirmed through the correlation between acceptance and action, quality of life, diabetes self-stigma, and experiential avoidance.
Results Construct validity, measured using confirmatory factor analysis, showed a good fit. The DAAS-K was positively correlated with acceptance and action, quality of life, and negatively correlated with diabetes self-stigma and experiential avoidance. As for internal reliability, the Cronbach’s α of the DAAS-K was .95.
Conclusion The DAAS-K can be applied to assess diabetes acceptance and action in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes and to compare the levels of psychological flexibility of patients with diabetes internationally.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop the Self-Care Non-adherence Risk Assessment Scale (SCNRAS) for patients with chronic illness in South Korea. Methods This study was conducted from April to July, 2020 and utilized a convenience sampling method to recruit 336 patients with chronic illness from three hospitals located in South Korea. The content, factorial structure, item-convergent/discriminant validity, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were evaluated. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Cronbach’s ⍺, and intra-class correlation coefficient. Results The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded six-factors. Convergent validity was demonstrated using measures of defining issues. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach’s ⍺ of .65~.81 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of .93~.98. The Self-Care Non-adherence Risk Assessment Scale for patients with chronic illness is a new instrument that comprehensively measures the knowledge, skill, physical function status, access to health care, social support, motivation, and confidence. It comprises 18 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The validity and reliability of the scale were verified. Conclusion: The scale developed through this study is expected to screen those who need nursing intervention early by predicting the self-care non-adherence risk group.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of self-care intervention using a mobile instant messenger on hemodialysis patient’s knowledge, self-efficacy, self-care behavior and physiological index Yu Kyung Shin, Mi Young Kim Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science.2024; 26(2): 123. CrossRef
Development of a Conceptual Framework for Non-Adherence to Self-Management in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Exploratory Study Ja Yun Choi, Eui Jeong Ryu, So Young Yun, Sehyun Cho Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2024; 36(2): 126. CrossRef
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (KESQ-NS). Methods The participants were 138 nursing students who have experience in clinical practice. The Korean version of ESQ-NS (KESQ-NS) was examined using content validity, construct validity, criterion-related validity, and testing of internal consistency reliability. Data were collected from November to December of 2019 through an online-survey. Results The KESQ-NS that was composed of 13 items was divided into three dimensions: Critical understanding of the patient, patient holistic care, patient privacy, and confidentiality. The instrument explained 67.9% of the total variance for ethical sensitivity. Cronbach’s ⍺ was .88. Conclusion: The KESQ-NS showed good validity and reliability. This instrument can be used to evaluate ethical sensitivity in nursing students in Korea.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students: psychometric properties of the Persian version Amir Jalali, Azam Sharifi, Behrouz Soltany, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Jalal Karimi, Hooman Ghasemi, Parnia Kalhory, khalil Moradi BMC Research Notes.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Nursing Professionalism, Ethical Sensitivity, and the Clinical Learning Environment on Nursing Students' Intention to Report Near Misses and Adverse Events Sookhee Yoon, Ha-Young Park Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2025; 32(2): 209. CrossRef
The psychometric properties of instruments measuring ethical sensitivity in nursing: a systematic review Lu Zhou, LiXiong Bi, YuMing Wu, Lei Wang, Gao Liu, EnLi Cai Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nursing Ethics Education for Undergraduate Nursing Students and Nurses Youngjin Lee, Soyoung Yu, Miyoung Kim, Wonjung Noh, Mi Yu, Yoomi Jung Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2022; 28(2): 164. CrossRef