Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

RCPHN : Research in Community and Public Health Nursing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > Volume 26(4); 2015 > Article
Original Article
The Effects of Home Visit Healthcare Using a Complex Program on Community-dwelling Frail Elders' Strength, Frailty, and Depression
Hee Gerl Kim
Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2015;26(4):405-414.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2015.26.4.405
Published online: December 31, 2015

College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.

• Received: September 28, 2015   • Revised: December 7, 2015   • Accepted: December 20, 2015

© 2015 Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev
  • 2,105 Views
  • 8 Download
  • 2 Crossref
  • Purpose
    The purposes of this study were to examine the effects of home visit healthcare using a complex program on community-dwelling frail elders' physical strength, frailty, and depression and to compare the effects among three regions.
  • Methods
    This study was conducted as a quasi-experimental study using one-group pretest-posttest design. A total of 86 subjects were sampled from three regions (metropolis, small city, and rural area). The program was applied for 14 weeks. This program consisted of disease management by a visiting nurse, exercise with a visiting nurse, self exercise, telephone monitoring, health education, counseling, providing handbook, and incentive. Physical strength was measured by balance, upper-limb, and lower-limb muscle strength. Frailty was measured by the Korean Frail Scale and depression was measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale. Paired t-test and ANCOVA were used to analyze the effects.
  • Results
    Physical strength, frailty, and depression were significantly improved after applying the complex program. There were not differences among the regions.
  • Conclusion
    Home visit healthcare using a complex program was effective in improving frail elders' physical strength, frailty, and depression. There were not differences among the regions. Therefore, home visit healthcare using a complex program needs to be expanded to other regions.
Figure 1

Home visit healthcare using complex program.

jkachn-26-405-g001.jpg
Table 1

The Visit Health Program Using Complex Program for the Frail Elderly

Domains Contents Instruments Frequency Personnels
Physical strength & mental status assessment · Measurement
· Planning
· Items
· Physical strength (Balance, upper-limb, and lower-limb strength)
· Frailty
· Depression
· Providing health mileage handbook, and poster on exercise, and self ckecklist
· Pre: at the beginning class
· Post: at the ending class
Visit nurse, physical therapist, exercise therapist
Complex exercise · Exercise without tools for muscle strength
· Hand exercise for preventing dementia
· Laughter Therapy
· Exercise with tools (Sera band, bean bag)
· Exercise with visit nurse
· Self ckecklist after exercise at home
· Telephone monitoring
· Providing mileage stickers
· 1 / week
· 2~3 / week
· 1 / week
· 1 / week
Visit nurse, physical therapist, exercise therapist
Health education · Nutrition
· Oral care
· Chronic disease management
· Providing mileage stickers · 1 / 4~6week Visit nurse, dietitians, dental hygiene agents
Table 2

General Characteristics of the Subjects

Variables Categories n (%) or M±SD
Region Metropolis 24 (27.90)
Small city 48 (55.81)
Rural area 14 (16.27)
Gender Male 9 (10.46)
Female 77 (89.53)
Age (year) 78.5±5.50
<80 55 (63.95)
≥80 31 (36.05)
Total 86 (100.00)
Table 3

Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program

Indicators Region Pre F (p)
M±SD
Physical function Balance (second) D-gu 4.13±6.16 0.53 (.594)
S-si 5.42±5.18
Y-gun 5.71±6.01
Low-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 6.50±2.99a 7.12 (.001)
b>a
S-si 10.02±4.18b
Y-gun 8.14±3.13ab
Upper-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 11.08±9.30 1.89 (.157)
S-si 13.19±4.95
Y-gun 9.86±3.84
Frailty D-gu 3.38±1.86 0.79 (.456)
S-si 3.58±1.39
Y-gun 4.00±1.11
Depression D-gu 4.96±3.94 0.42 (.662)
S-si 5.56±3.25
Y-gun 4.71±4.12
Physical function Balance (second) <80 6.11±6.37 2.27 (.008)
≥80 3.32±3.10
Low-limb strength (frequency) <80 9.15±4.25 1.26 (.210)
≥80 8.00±3.62
Upper-limb strength (frequency) <80 12.47±6.92 0.80 (.427)
≥80 11.32±5.40
Frailty <80 3.44±1.49 -1.32 (.191)
≥80 3.87±1.43
Depression <80 5.05±3.83 -0.69 (.490)
≥80 5.61±3.08
Table 4

Differences in Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before and After Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program

Indicators Pre Post t (p) Post-Pre
M±SD M±SD M±SD
Physical function Balance (second) 5.31±5.70 9.85±12.63 -4.08 (<.001) 4.54±9.96
Lower-limb strength (frequency) 8.85±4.08 11.68±4.80 -6.10 (<.001) 2.83±3.85
Upper-limb strength (frequency) 12.12±6.46 17.16±5.82 -6.93 (<.001) 5.04±6.54
Frailty 3.59±1.52 2.19±1.69 1.77 (<.001) -1.41±1.63
Depression 5.22±3.58 4.35±3.57 1.64 (.025) -0.88±4.37
Table 5

Differences in Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before and After Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program by Regions and Age

Indicators Region Post-Pre Source F (p)
<80 ≥80
M±SD M±SD
Physical function Balance (second) D-gu 2.94±4.71 2.29±2.69 Region 1.51 (.228)
S-si 8.00±14.85 3.81±6.08 Age 0.66 (.418)
Y-gun 1.75±7.25 0.20±1.31 Region*Age 0.24 (.778)
Low-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 3.88±4.19 2.71±1.70 Region 1.09 (.340)
S-si 3.24±4.81 2.43±3.39 Age 0.89 (.766)
Y-gun 0.75±1.16 1.80±1.41 Region*Age 0.35 (.709)
Upper-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 7.69±9.47 8.57±6.80 Region 3.73 (.029)
S-si 4.41±5.66 4.56±5.60 Age 0.41 (.525)
Y-gun 1.00±2.00 3.20±2.73 Region*Age 0.13 (.883)
Frailty D-gu -0.88±1.50 -2.00±1.15 Region 0.45 (.643)
S-si -1.70±1.67 -1.44±1.67 Age 0.33 (.566)
Y-gun -1.13±1.46 -1.00±2.45 Region*Age 1.22 (.301)
Depression D-gu -1.19±2.61 -3.00±4.65 Region 3.03 (.054)
S-si -1.45±3.26 0.06±4.02 Age 0.15 (.698)
Y-gun 0.25±2.87 1.60±2.87 Region*Age 1.68 (.194)

This research was supported by the National Health Insurance Corporation research fund of 2014(GCU-2015-0161).

  • 1. Sunwoo D, Song HJ, Lee YH, Kim DJ. Study on development of health care services and coordinated system for frail elderly people. Research Report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2004. Report No.: Research Report 2004-02.
  • 2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Caring for frail elderly people: Policies in evolution. Social Policy Studies. Paris: OECD; 1996. 06;p. 57–58. No 19.
  • 3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–M157.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Jung KH, Lee YK, Park BM, Lee SJ, Lee YH. Analysis of the survey of living conditions and welfare needs of Korean older persons. Research Paper. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012. Report No.: 2012-47-14.
  • 5. Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, Anderson CS. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(1):48–61. ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, Ryan ND, Clements KM, Solares GR, Nelson ME, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1769–1775. ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, Chaves P, et al. Phenotype of frailty: Characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(3):262–266. ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Sunwoo D, Oh YH, Lee SH, Oh JS, Lee SK. The future policy issues for health of the eldery: Construction of functional independence promotion system of everyday living activity. Research Report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2009. Report No.: 2009-22.
  • 9. Choi KW, Park UA, Lee IS. Factors influencing the fear of falling according to gender in frail elderly. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2011;31(3):539–551.
  • 10. Park JK, Kim SR. Factors affecting the elderly's frailty among the vulnerable social group. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2014;34(3):441–456.
  • 11. Kim CO, Lee HY, Ho SH, Park HS, Park CW. Effects of visiting prehabilitation program against functional decline in the frail elderly: A prospective randomized community trial. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2010;30(4):1293–1309.
  • 12. Yoo JS, Jeon MY, Kim CG. Effects of a fall prevention program on falls in frail elders living at home in rural communities. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013;43(5):613–625.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Kwon SM, Park JS. The effect of health promotion program for frail elderly residents on health promoting behavior and health status. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013;25(2):194–206.ArticlePDF
  • 14. Kim YJ, Ha JY. The effects of visiting exercise program and telecoaching for physical activity promotion on physical fitness and quality of life in the frail elderly. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011;23(2):198–207.
  • 15. Park YI, Lee KE, Kim TI, Jeon MH, Kim DU, Kim JH. The effects of exercise in the frail elderly. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2012;23(1):91–101. Article
  • 16. Lee IS, Ko Y, Lee KO, Yim ES. Evaluation of the effects of a frailty preventing multi-factorial program concentrated on local communities for high-risk younger and older elderly people. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2012;23(2):201–211. Article
  • 17. Kim JS, Lee SB. Effect of band exercise on health status, activities of daily living health-related quality of life in the frail elderly. J Korea Soc Wellness. 2010;5(1):93–101.
  • 18. Choi YH, Kim NY. The effects of an exercise program using a resident volunteer as a lay health leader for elders' physical fitness, cognitive function, depression, and quality of life. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2013;24(3):346–357.Article
  • 19. National Health Insurance Service. 2014 long term care insurance statistics. Year Book. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service; 2014. Report No.: 11-B550928-000038-09.
  • 20. Ministry of Health & Welfare. 2013 the guideline for community integration health promotion program: Visit health care. Guideline. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare; 2013. Report No.: 11-1352000-000874-10.
  • 21. Hong SY. The effects of obesity and sarcopenic obesity on physical function in Korean older adults. Korean J Health Promot Dis Prev. 2008;8(4):256–264.
  • 22. Hwang HS, Kwon IS, Park BJ, Cho B, Yoon JL, Won CW. The validity and reliability of Korean frailty index. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2010;14(4):191–202.Article
  • 23. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17(1):37–49. Article
  • 24. Ki BS. A preliminary study for the standardization of geriatric depression scale short form-Korea version. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1996;35(2):298–307.
  • 25. Jo YH. Effect and status on the independence promotion program of home visiting serviced elderly in rural area. Korean Public Health Res. 2014;40(2):41–51.
  • 26. Kim JI. Levels of health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and its related factors among vulnerable elders receiving home visiting health care services in some rural areas. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2013;24(1):99–109.Article
  • 27. Moon MJ. Factors influencing depression in elderly people living at home. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010;40(4):542–550.ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Sok SH, Kim KB. A comparative study of the factors influencing quality of life between urban and rural elderly. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17(3):311–321. ArticlePDF
  • 29. Durazo EM, Jones MR, Wallace SP, Van Arsdale J, Aydin M, Stewart C. The health status and unique health challenges of rural older adults in California [Internet] LA: UCLA Center for health policy research; 2011;06;cited 2015 October 20. Available from: http://www.globalaging.org/ruralaging/us/2011/The%20Health%20Status.pdf
  • 30. Lee JM, Kwon KS, Lee JH, Jeon GS. A study on health behavior of the populations in urban and rural area. Korean J Rural Med. 2005;30(2):213–225.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effects of a Customized Health Promotion Program on Depression, Cognitive Functioning, and Physical Health of Elderly Women Living Alone in Community: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
      Ye Ri Ja Park, Kyeong-Yae Sohng
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2019; 49(5): 515.     CrossRef
    • Effects of a Health Promotion Empowerment Program Using a Resident Volunteer as a Lay Health Leader on Frail Elders' Health and Empowerment
      Jeong Sook Park, Yun Jung Oh
      Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2018; 29(3): 335.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    We recommend
    Related articles
    The Effects of Home Visit Healthcare Using a Complex Program on Community-dwelling Frail Elders' Strength, Frailty, and Depression
    Image
    Figure 1 Home visit healthcare using complex program.
    The Effects of Home Visit Healthcare Using a Complex Program on Community-dwelling Frail Elders' Strength, Frailty, and Depression
    Domains Contents Instruments Frequency Personnels
    Physical strength & mental status assessment · Measurement
    · Planning
    · Items
    · Physical strength (Balance, upper-limb, and lower-limb strength)
    · Frailty
    · Depression
    · Providing health mileage handbook, and poster on exercise, and self ckecklist
    · Pre: at the beginning class
    · Post: at the ending class
    Visit nurse, physical therapist, exercise therapist
    Complex exercise · Exercise without tools for muscle strength
    · Hand exercise for preventing dementia
    · Laughter Therapy
    · Exercise with tools (Sera band, bean bag)
    · Exercise with visit nurse
    · Self ckecklist after exercise at home
    · Telephone monitoring
    · Providing mileage stickers
    · 1 / week
    · 2~3 / week
    · 1 / week
    · 1 / week
    Visit nurse, physical therapist, exercise therapist
    Health education · Nutrition
    · Oral care
    · Chronic disease management
    · Providing mileage stickers · 1 / 4~6week Visit nurse, dietitians, dental hygiene agents
    Variables Categories n (%) or M±SD
    Region Metropolis 24 (27.90)
    Small city 48 (55.81)
    Rural area 14 (16.27)
    Gender Male 9 (10.46)
    Female 77 (89.53)
    Age (year) 78.5±5.50
    <80 55 (63.95)
    ≥80 31 (36.05)
    Total 86 (100.00)
    Indicators Region Pre F (p)
    M±SD
    Physical function Balance (second) D-gu 4.13±6.16 0.53 (.594)
    S-si 5.42±5.18
    Y-gun 5.71±6.01
    Low-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 6.50±2.99a 7.12 (.001)
    b>a
    S-si 10.02±4.18b
    Y-gun 8.14±3.13ab
    Upper-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 11.08±9.30 1.89 (.157)
    S-si 13.19±4.95
    Y-gun 9.86±3.84
    Frailty D-gu 3.38±1.86 0.79 (.456)
    S-si 3.58±1.39
    Y-gun 4.00±1.11
    Depression D-gu 4.96±3.94 0.42 (.662)
    S-si 5.56±3.25
    Y-gun 4.71±4.12
    Physical function Balance (second) <80 6.11±6.37 2.27 (.008)
    ≥80 3.32±3.10
    Low-limb strength (frequency) <80 9.15±4.25 1.26 (.210)
    ≥80 8.00±3.62
    Upper-limb strength (frequency) <80 12.47±6.92 0.80 (.427)
    ≥80 11.32±5.40
    Frailty <80 3.44±1.49 -1.32 (.191)
    ≥80 3.87±1.43
    Depression <80 5.05±3.83 -0.69 (.490)
    ≥80 5.61±3.08
    Indicators Pre Post t (p) Post-Pre
    M±SD M±SD M±SD
    Physical function Balance (second) 5.31±5.70 9.85±12.63 -4.08 (<.001) 4.54±9.96
    Lower-limb strength (frequency) 8.85±4.08 11.68±4.80 -6.10 (<.001) 2.83±3.85
    Upper-limb strength (frequency) 12.12±6.46 17.16±5.82 -6.93 (<.001) 5.04±6.54
    Frailty 3.59±1.52 2.19±1.69 1.77 (<.001) -1.41±1.63
    Depression 5.22±3.58 4.35±3.57 1.64 (.025) -0.88±4.37
    Indicators Region Post-Pre Source F (p)
    <80 ≥80
    M±SD M±SD
    Physical function Balance (second) D-gu 2.94±4.71 2.29±2.69 Region 1.51 (.228)
    S-si 8.00±14.85 3.81±6.08 Age 0.66 (.418)
    Y-gun 1.75±7.25 0.20±1.31 Region*Age 0.24 (.778)
    Low-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 3.88±4.19 2.71±1.70 Region 1.09 (.340)
    S-si 3.24±4.81 2.43±3.39 Age 0.89 (.766)
    Y-gun 0.75±1.16 1.80±1.41 Region*Age 0.35 (.709)
    Upper-limb strength (frequency) D-gu 7.69±9.47 8.57±6.80 Region 3.73 (.029)
    S-si 4.41±5.66 4.56±5.60 Age 0.41 (.525)
    Y-gun 1.00±2.00 3.20±2.73 Region*Age 0.13 (.883)
    Frailty D-gu -0.88±1.50 -2.00±1.15 Region 0.45 (.643)
    S-si -1.70±1.67 -1.44±1.67 Age 0.33 (.566)
    Y-gun -1.13±1.46 -1.00±2.45 Region*Age 1.22 (.301)
    Depression D-gu -1.19±2.61 -3.00±4.65 Region 3.03 (.054)
    S-si -1.45±3.26 0.06±4.02 Age 0.15 (.698)
    Y-gun 0.25±2.87 1.60±2.87 Region*Age 1.68 (.194)
    Table 1 The Visit Health Program Using Complex Program for the Frail Elderly

    Table 2 General Characteristics of the Subjects

    Table 3 Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program

    Table 4 Differences in Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before and After Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program

    Table 5 Differences in Physical Function, Frailty, and Depression Before and After Home Visit Healthcare Using Complex Program by Regions and Age


    RCPHN : Research in Community and Public Health Nursing
    TOP