Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

RCPHN : Research in Community and Public Health Nursing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Res Community Public Health Nurs > Volume 36(1); 2025 > Article
Review Article
Factors associated with Hypertensive Retinopathy among People with Hypertension: A Systematic Review
Ihn Sook Jeong1orcid, Chan Mi Kang2orcid, Eun Joo Lee3orcid, Seol Bin Kim4orcid, Young Kyung Seo5orcid, Young Shin Son6orcid, Kun Hyung Kim7orcid
Research in Community and Public Health Nursing 2025;36(1):130-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/rcphn.2024.00857
Published online: March 31, 2025

1Professor, College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea

2Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Division of Health Science, Dongseo University, Busan, Korea

3Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing∙Research Institute of Dong-Eui Nursing Science, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Korea

4Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Dongyang University, Yeongju, Korea

5PhD student, College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea

6RN, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea

7Professor, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea

Corresponding author: Chan Mi Kang Department of Nursing, Division of Health Science, Dongseo University, 47, Jurye-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan 47011, Korea Tel: +82-51-320-4246 Fax: +82-51-320-2721 E-mail: chan-mi0701@hanmail.net
• Received: October 21, 2024   • Revised: January 2, 2025   • Accepted: January 26, 2025

© 2025 Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0) which allows readers to disseminate and reuse the article, as well as share and reuse the scientific material. It does not permit the creation of derivative works without specific permission.

prev next
  • 189 Views
  • 4 Download
  • Purpose
    The associated factors for hypertensive retinopathy (HTR) are rarely investigated. This study aimed to identify the associated factors for HTR using a systematic review.
  • Methods
    The review included cross-sectional, case-controlled, and cohort studies on HTR risk factors published in Korean and English with full texts available from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Korean databases. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist.
  • Results
    Eleven studies were finally selected, and three studies including patients with hypertension without diabetes mellitus, older age, male sex, alcohol consumption, the duration of hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, microalbuminuria, high creatinine levels, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular changes were identified as factors associated with HTR. Conversely, in the remaining eight studies, younger age, non-smoking status, and renal function indicators (albuminuria, high creatinine levels, chronic kidney disease, and uric acid) were identified as associated factors.
  • Conclusions
    Regardless of the inclusion of patients with diabetes mellitus, impaired kidney functions were determined as significant factors associated with retinopathy in patients with HTR. However, considering a limited number of evidence and lack of evidence to confirm causality, we recommend further research on renal function and HTR.
Hypertension is a prevalent chronic disease worldwide, and its prevalence is expected to increase in the future owing to an aging population and unhealthy lifestyles [1,2]. In the past three decades, the hypertensive population has significantly increased, nearly doubling from 6.5 million to 1.28 billion worldwide among people aged 30-79 years [3]. The age-standardized prevalence rates of hypertension are 32% and 34% for female and male adults, respectively, suggesting that roughly 1 in 3–4 adults is affected [4]. According to the 2023 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, hypertension affects 28.6% of adults aged ≥19 years and 63.5% of those aged ≥65 [5]. It is the second most prevalent disease after periodontal disease, according to medical benefit statistics [6]. Despite the high prevalence of hypertension, its control rate, denoting the percentage of people with normal blood pressure in the prevalent population, is notably low. According to the KCDC [5], the control rate is 50.4% among individuals aged ≥19 years. However, it declined to 35.2% among those in their 40s as the prevalence of hypertension significantly increased.
Persistent uncontrolled hypertension can lead to microvascular and macrovascular complications. Hypertensive retinopathy (HTR) is a common disease found in adults with hypertension and is a representative microvascular complication of hypertension [7,8]. Studies conducted since 2000 have reported a high prevalence of HTR in both nondiabetic hypertensive patients, reaching up to 57.1% [9], and hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), with rates ranging from 59.3% to 74.4% [7,10,11]. Retinal blood vessels differ from other blood vessels in that they lack sympathetic nerve innervation and are protected by a blood-retinal barrier. Therefore, an increase in blood pressure directly affects the retinal blood vessels. The primary responses to stimulation are arteriolar constriction and stenosis. Prolonged pressure can lead to reduced perfusion due to arteriosclerosis, causing retinal ischemia, vascular remodeling, and arteriovenous nicking. Whether acute or chronic, this sustained pressure accelerates vascular damage, leading to the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier. This breakdown results in hemorrhage and the exudation of hard lipid exudates. Additionally, increased intracranial pressure compresses the optic nerve papilla and surrounding blood vessels, causing optic nerve papilla ischemia and papilledema, ultimately contributing to vision loss [12]. Although HTR can lead to vision loss, its significance lies in its role as a risk factor for the occurrence and worsening of diabetic retinopathy (DR). DR is one of the most common causes of irreversible visual impairment in working-age individuals [13]. Hypertension-induced damage to the retinal vessels is associated with proliferative changes and the worsening of DR [14]. Notably, the rigorous control of blood pressure to less than 150/85 mmHg slows the progression of DR and reduces the risk of vision loss compared with the control measures [15].
Considering the significant impact and severity of HTR, proactive measures are essential for its prevention and management. The prevention and control strategies to reduce the disease burden are generally categorized into population risk and high-risk strategies, which are often used in combination [16,17]. Population strategies focus on decreasing the overall risk of HTR by preventing the development of hypertension, which is the primary component of the disease. High-risk strategies are aimed at diminishing the risk of retinopathy in hypertensive individuals through the identification of risk factors, individual risk assessment, and the screening and management of those deemed to be at high risk. Population strategies can be applied to local populations who have not yet developed hypertension, while high-risk strategies should be prioritized for those who have been diagnosed with hypertension. However, recent systematic reviews have explored the risk factors for DR [14,18,19], but similar comprehensive reviews for HTR are currently lacking.
Both hypertension and hyperglycemia are significant associated factors for retinal diseases. From epidemiological, morphological, and pathophysiological perspectives, the signs of HTR exhibit striking similarities with those of DR [20]. Hypertension and DM share a reciprocal relationship [21], with hypertension being a risk factor for the development and exacerbation of DR [22]. Additionally, considering that approximately 20% of patients with HTR have comorbid diabetes [23], associated factors for HTR may vary depending on whether a patient has concurrent DM. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to identify associated factors for HTR in patients with hypertension, especially depending on the presence of DM.
Protocol and registration
The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [24] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [25] (Appendix 1, 2). Prior to this study, the protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration date: October 6, 2023; registration number: CRD42023470124).
PEO and eligibility criteria
The key question guiding this review was “What are the associated factors for retinopathy among patients with hypertension depending on the presence of DM?”. In this context, participants (P) were defined as hypertensive patients aged 18 years or older with a high prevalence of HTR, exposure of interest (E) as associated factors, and outcomes (O) as retinopathy. Factors associated with HTR were limited to those analyzed by multiple logistic regression and multiple linear regression. Cross-sectional, case-controlled and cohort studies; studies published in Korean and English languages; and studies with available original full texts were included in the review. By contrast, abstracts, book chapters, posters, and protocols were also excluded.
Search strategy
The Cochrane Handbook recommends searching both MEDLINE and Embase for high-quality systematic reviews [26]. A comprehensive search was conducted using four international databases (PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and Web of Science) and three Korean databases (Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), Koreanstudies Information Service System (KISS), and DBpia) from their inception to June 24, 2023. The search terms were categorized into MeSH terms and natural language terms about HTR and its associated or risk factors, and then combined using the Boolean search operator “AND” (Table 1). The MeSH terms were derived from PubMed, while the natural language terms were identified from systematic reviews of DR [14,18,27] and refined with the assistance of a librarian. Appendix 3 presents the detailed search strategies. Gray literature search was limited to domestic literature as it was difficult to find foreign literature.
Study selection
Two groups of paired reviewers jointly screened the literature. Four reviewers assessed study eligibility for the international database, and two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for the Korean database. In cases of disagreements among the reviewers, a third meta-analysis expert was consulted. Endnote, a bibliographic export program, was used to manage the bibliographic information of all articles, and duplicate articles were excluded. Following the removal of duplicates, titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify records that met the inclusion criteria, and ineligible studies were excluded. The remaining articles underwent a thorough eligibility check through a full-text review, and the reasons for exclusion were described.
Data extraction
Six researchers independently extracted the data from the articles, and the first and second authors confirmed the final review data. The first author, year, country of publication, study design, participant characteristics (sample size, mean or median age, diagnosis criteria for hypertension, and inclusion or exclusion of diabetes), diagnostic criteria for hypertension, independent variables, dependent variables, and associated factors (group category, adjusted odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) based on the multiple linear regression analysis) identified in the multiple regression analysis were extracted using Excel. The associated factors for HTR were summarized by listing the data extracted from each article and classified according to the presence of DM of the participants.
Methodological quality assessment
Six researchers independently evaluated the methodological quality of the selected studies using a checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies [28] was utilized as the selected studies followed a cross-sectional design. The scoring criteria for assessment were categorized as “Yes,” “No,” “Unclear,” and “Not applicable.” A “Yes” response indicated that the methodological quality assessment criteria set by JBI were satisfied. The JBI quality assessment tool does not provide quantitative criteria for evaluating the quality of articles but rather assesses the appropriateness of the assessment questions. Six researchers independently evaluated the quality of the articles, and a consensus was reached through thorough discussion.
Ethical considerations
The study was conducted after receiving approval for exempt review from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University (No.: 2023_121_HR).
Search results

1. Study selection

A total of 19,094 potential records were retrieved from seven databases: PubMed (n=3,414), Embase (n=12,128), CINAHL (n=2,602), Web of Science (n=947), RISS (n=3), KISS (n=0), and DBpia (n=0). After removing 5,180 duplicates, 838 articles not published in Korean or English, and 4,157 studies with ineligible study designs, the titles and abstracts of the remaining 8,919 studies were screened. Sixty studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for full-text review; however, the full texts of 15 studies were not available. An additional 34 studies were excluded as 10 of them did not investigate the associated factors for HTR and 23 included healthy individuals. A total of 11 studies were included in the final analysis (Appendix 4). Among the 11 studies, three included patients with DM, while eight excluded them. The entire search process is illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).

2. Methodological quality assessment

Six studies met all eight criteria (72.7%) (Table 2). Two studies [29,30] provided limited information regarding the participants and settings. One study did not identify the confounding factors and thus failed to address them [31]. None of the studies were excluded based on methodological quality.

3. Characteristics of included studies

Table 3 presents a summary of the characteristics of the 11 included studies. A total of 21,954 participants from seven countries were included in this systematic review. Among the 11 studies, the sample sizes ranged from 73 [32] to 12,966 [23]. The mean age of the participants, where specified, ranged from 45.8±14.3 [33] to 63.9±7.3 years [23]. All included studies had a cross-sectional design. Three studies were conducted in the Republic of Türkiye [29,30,32], three studies in China [23,34,35], one study in Uganda [36], one study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [31], one study in Tanzania [33], one study in Nepal [37], and one study in the United States [38]. All included studies regardless of the presence of DM were published after 2005, with the majority published within the last 10 years.
Factors associated with HTR
The identified factors associated with HTR included age, sex, lifestyle, blood pressure, changes in the heart and blood vessels, impaired kidney function, medications, and serum glucose and lipid levels (Table 3, 4). Among the 11 studies, three included patients with DM [23,31,34], while eight excluded them (Table 4). The common associated factors identified in both studies were age and impaired kidney function.
Some differences emerged in the findings based on the included participants. Among the three studies that identified age as an associated factor, one study including patients with hypertension with DM [31] reported a 77% lower association in those aged >50 years, while two studies excluding patients with hypertension with DM reported that older age posed a stronger association [30,36]. In terms of lifestyle factors, smoking was identified as a protective factor in a previous study that included participants with DM [31], while alcohol intake was identified as an associated factor in a study that excluded participants with DM [33].
Impaired kidney function was the most frequently reported associated factor in the included studies. Among the 11 studies, 10 examined various renal function indicators. Among these, the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) [31,33], hyperuricemia [23], microalbuminuria [30], high creatinine levels [30], urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and albuminuria [34] were identified as significant associated factors in five studies. Among these factors, creatinine levels had the highest odds ratio at 10.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.45–44.74, p=.002) [30]. The likelihood of HTR increased significantly with a more severe stage of CKD, with odds ratios of 4.28 in stage 4 (95% CI:1.56–11.74, p=.005) and 8.62 in stage 5 (95% CI:3.56–20.87, p<.001), compared with stage 3 [33]. HTR was also 2.04 times more prevalent in patients with microalbuminuria (95% CI:1.22–3.41, p=.006) [30], 1.57–2.02 times higher in patients with albuminuria [34], and 1.18 times more common in the patients with hyperuricemia (95% CI: 1.05–1.33, p=.004) [23]. A higher grade of HTR was more likely to be associated with grade 3 UACR (β=5.17, p=.012) [23].
Blood pressure was not identified as an associated factor in any of the three studies that included participants with DM, while three studies that excluded participants with DM recognized blood pressure as an associated factor. In a study conducted in Uganda [36], HTR was 3.53 times more likely to occur in patients with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥140mmHg. In a study conducted in Tanzania, patients with grade I hypertension and patients with grade III hypertension had 2.67 times and 2.51 times higher risk of developing HTR, respectively, than those with normal blood pressure [33]. Karadag et al. [30] specifically examined the association between changes in blood pressure from daytime to nighttime and reported that a reduction of <10% in the mean SBP was as a significant associated factor, with an odds ratio of 2.20. A longer hypertension duration has also been associated with the development of HTR [35,36]. In both studies, a hypertension duration of >5 years was identified as an associated factor.
Four studies reported changes in the heart and blood vessels as associated factors [29,32,35,38]. HTR was more likely to occur in patients with aortic arch calcification, carotid plaques, carotid intima-media thickening, epicardial adipose thickness, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), with odds ratios ranging from 1.674 to 13.13. In a study by Zhang et al. [34], the identification of endothelin-1(ET-1) as a significant associated factor for HTR also highlighted its diagnostic value. The authors suggested that 43.5ng/l can be used as a diagnostic threshold.
Medication, serum glucose, and lipid levels were also identified as associated factors in studies that excluded participants with DM. Among the antihypertensive medications, the association of HTR were 3.05 times higher in patients who used β-blockers, 2.16 times higher in patients who used calcium channel blockers, and 2.91 times higher in patients who used diuretics [36]. Higher serum glucose [29] and lipid levels [32,37] slightly increased the likelihood of developing HTR.
A systematic review was conducted to examine the associated factors for HTR, and 11 cross-sectional studies were selected. These studies were categorized into two groups to analyze the factors associated with HTR. Three studies included hypertensive patients with DM, while eight studies only included patients with hypertension without DM.
Impaired kidney function is an associated factor for HTR regardless of the presence of DM [23,30,31,33,34]. Hypertension can either cause or result from CKD and also influence its progression [39]; its severity increases with the declining estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and advanced stages of CKD [33]. Additionally, DM is a chief associated factor for CKD, and the incidence of CKD is higher in patients with both hypertension and DM than in those with either hypertension or DM alone [40]. Among renal function indicators, CKD [31], UACR [34], albuminuria [34], and uric acid [23] were identified as significant factors in the studies that included individuals with DM, while CKD [33], creatinine levels [30], and microalbuminuria [30] were significantly associated with HTR in studies that excluded individuals with DM. Studies employing predictive models of DR have consistently highlighted abnormal UACR [41], high creatinine levels [42,43], and low eGFR [43] as associated factors for retinopathy, supporting our findings.
This suggests that individuals with hypertension, diabetes, and CKD or those with elevated levels of creatinine, albuminuria, and uric acid should undergo regular eye examinations in addition to periodic renal function assessments. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of the selected studies and variations in the types of renal function indicators and outcome test methods among the studies, it was not possible to determine the differences in renal function indicators based on the presence or absence of DM and identify the most sensitive predictors for HTR. Therefore, further longitudinal studies are warranted.
Among the general characteristics of the participants, age emerged as a factor associated with HTR in 3 of the 11 studies. Studies that involved patients with hypertension without DM demonstrated that older age is a significant associated factor for HTR [30,36]. Conversely, studies involving patients with hypertension with DM revealed that older age is a protective factor against HTR [31]. Previous studies on age and DR have shown that age is a protective factor against DR, with patients with DM aged ≥45 years having a reduced risk of severe fibrovascular proliferation compared with those aged <45 years [44]. Additionally, DR decreased with increasing age [42]. In light of these findings, active screening for retinopathy should be considered in older patients, primarily those with a longer duration of hypertension but without DM. Conversely, screening for retinopathy should begin at a younger age, specifically at the time of DM or hypertension diagnosis in patients with hypertension with DM.
Smoking was investigated in six studies and was shown to lower the risk of HTR in one study that included patients with DM [31]. The relationship between smoking and DR has demonstrated inconsistency, with smoking identified as an associated factor for DR in a study involving individuals with type 1 DM [45] and as a protective factor in some studies involving individuals with type 2 DM [45,46]. In general, smoking is known to reduce retinal blood flow due to the vasoconstrictor effects of nicotine [47] and to decrease blood oxygen-carrying capacity and retinal oxygen delivery by increasing carbon monoxide hemoglobin levels [48]. As the study that identified an association between smoking and HTR [31] was cross-sectional in nature without temporal follow-up, it was difficult to conclude the relationship between smoking and HTR. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm the causality.
Alcohol consumption was investigated in 4 of the 11 studies and was a factor associated with HTR in one study that excluded individuals with DM [33]. This aligns with the results of previous research establishing positive correlations between alcohol consumption, blood pressure, hypertension prevalence, and cardiovascular disease risk [49]. However, this observation does not consider the potential amplification of vascular complications in the presence of comorbid DM, necessitating more stringent blood pressure control [21]. Therefore, additional studies are needed to investigate the effect of alcohol consumption on the incidence of HTR in patients with and without DM, and alcohol abstinence is recommended to prevent HTR.
Among blood pressure values, SBP was investigated in eight studies but was reported as a factor associated with HTR in only one study that excluded individuals with DM [36]. In addition, the duration of hypertension, high BP levels, and non-dipping hypertension (HTN) were identified only in studies that excluded individuals with DM. Additionally, the duration of hypertension was a predictor of HTR in two studies with conflicting results. Higher BP levels [33] and non-dipping HTN [30] have been shown to increase the risk of HTR. Persistently high blood pressure causes changes in the retinal arteries, triggering the occurrence of HTR symptoms including microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudation of blood and lipids, retinal ischemia, and papilledema [50]. Given this pathophysiology, a robust association exists between the duration of high blood pressure and HTR [35,36]. Generally, a diagnosis of hypertension exceeding 5 years increases the risk of developing retinopathy [36]. However, little is known about the appropriate timing of eye examinations. Therefore, longitudinal studies including people with DM are needed to determine the risk of developing HTR depending on the degree and duration of hypertension, the presence of DM, and the appropriate timing of eye examinations after the diagnosis of hypertension.
Indicators related to lipid metabolism were investigated in studies that excluded individuals with DM, and low-density lipids were identified as a factor associated with HTR in one of two studies and hyperlipidemia in one of three studies. Hyperlipidemia causes increased blood viscosity, atherosclerosis formation, and thickening of the arterial wall, leading to endothelial cell damage and plaque formation. This process results in infarction and ischemic damage to the target organ and is closely associated with heart problems, stroke, and peripheral artery disease [32]. Dyslipidemia can also exacerbate elevated blood pressure, further amplifying the target organ damage throughout the body [37]. These findings underscore the necessity of treating hyperlipidemia to prevent HTR.
Moreover, changes in the cardiovascular parameters such as plasma levels of ET-1, fat thickness of the epicardium, LVH, intima-media thickness of the carotid artery, carotid atherosclerotic plaques, and aortic arch calcification were investigated in two studies. Among these, LVH was associated with a 4.01-fold increase in the odds ratio of HTR in a study that excluded patients with DM [38]. Furthermore, severe cardiac and carotid wall alterations have been observed in participants with severe HTR [38]. Plasma ET-1 levels and fat thickness of the outer cardiac membrane were investigated in studies excluding patients with DM and were shown to be associated factors for HTR [32,35]. Presence of aortic arch calcification was significantly associated with HTR in a study excluding individuals with DM [29]. These findings suggest that HTR can predict other conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and CKD [12].
Finally, medication history was identified as a factor associated with HTR. In one study that excluded patients with DM, the association of HTR was higher in patients who used beta-blockers than in those who used diuretics or calcium channel blockers. In another study [38] that excluded patients with DM, medication use was not significantly associated with HTR. Given that newly diagnosed patients with hypertension without antihypertensive treatment have a higher incidence of HTR [32] and that effective blood pressure control reduces the risk of retinopathy [35], additional studies accounting for the adherence and adverse effects of medications are needed.
Nursing interventions and health education should be provided for the prevention and management of HTR in patients with hypertension in the community. Specifically, the Primary Care Chronic Disease Management Program should include screening and management of high-risk groups for hypertensive retinopathy in patients with hypertension. Currently, retinal disease is confirmed through questionnaires in patients with diabetes or hypertension, but eye examinations for patients with hypertension should be included in the screening and evaluation area. Specific guidelines are needed for patient risk group classification so that patients with hypertension can be classified as medium-risk or high-risk groups when they have kidney disease-related characteristics. Accordingly, close management including eye examinations is necessary. Nurses should educate patients with hypertension or diabetes that eye examinations and management should begin from the time diabetes or hypertension is additionally diagnosed. They should also educate that periodic kidney function evaluations are necessary.
The significance of this study lies in its rarity as a systematic review of HTR. While previous systematic reviews of retinopathy predominantly focused on diabetic retinopathy, this study identified the factors associated with HTR based on the adjusted values. Second, this study aimed to report the factors associated with HTR in patients with hypertension with and without DM to identify those who require early screening for HTR based on the concurrence of DM. Third, the procedures of conducting systematic reviews were strictly followed, including PROSPERO registration and adherence to JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA guidelines. Additionally, a quality assessment was conducted to increase the precision of findings by selectively including studies that performed multiple regression analyses.
Nevertheless, this study has a few limitations that must be addressed. First, the studies included in this review were cross-sectional in nature and had a limitation in establishing a temporal relationship between HTR and associated factors. That is, though impaired kidney function or cardiovascular changes showed significant association with HTR, it is not known which precede. Therefore, further studies should employ longitudinal study designs, such as cohort studies, to establish etiological relationship between HTR and associated factors. Second, the limitation of including only written in English and Korean may have issues with language bias (selection bias), necessitating future studies in diverse languages. Third, the predominantly Turkish and Chinese origin of studies included in this review, with additional studies from the United States, Congo, Uganda, and Nepal, may limit the generalizability of the findings to other cultural contexts. Conducting associated factor studies for HTR in diverse cultures and regions is crucial for drawing generalizable conclusions. Nonetheless, this study is significant in that it provides an opportunity for new research by identifying gaps in existing knowledge, areas of insufficient evidence, and limitations of existing studies. Fourth, although the studies included in this review demonstrated good methodological quality, caution is advised when interpreting the results from the study by Kabedi et al. [31] due to its lower rating concerning confounding factor identification, strategies to address them, and valid and reliable measurements of the outcome variables. Fifth, the caution observed during the comparison of all included studies arises from the heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria, types of variables and measures, and the presentation of results. Additionally, the assessment of most factors, except for age and duration of hypertension, was conducted in only one study. Consequently, a meta-analysis was not performed. Hence, the pooled effect estimate could not be calculated. Finally, adjusted associated factors were extracted from each study, but some studies did not indicate exactly which variables were adjusted. Accordingly, this study presented explanatory variables that were expected to have been adjusted.
In this study, the factors associated with HTR, including older age, male sex, alcohol consumption, duration of hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, microalbuminuria, elevated serum creatinine levels, CKD, and abnormal cardiovascular findings, were identified through a systematic review of patients with hypertension without DM. In studies that included patients with hypertension with DM, younger age, non-smoking status, and impaired kidney function manifested by albuminuria, elevated serum creatinine levels, CKD, and uric acid were identified as associated factors. Regardless of the inclusion of participants with DM, the parameters of impaired kidney function, such as albuminuria, serum creatinine levels, and CKD, have been identified as major associated factors for retinopathy in patients with hypertension. However, considering limited number of evidence and lack of evidence to confirm causality, we recommend further research on renal function and HTR. Based on the findings of this study, community nurses can produce educational materials and provide education to prevent retinopathy in people with high blood pressure or high blood pressure with diabetes. In addition, nurses can recommend periodic retinopathy screening to those with associated factors for hypertensive retinopathy. 

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by all authors.

Funding

None.

Authors’ contributions

Ihn Sook Jeong contributed to conceptualization, project administration, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, resources & software, methodology, validation, writing - original draft, review & editing, and supervision. Chan Mi Kang contributed to conceptualization, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, resources & software, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing - original draft, review & editing. Eun Joo Lee, Seol Bin Kim, and Young Kyung Seo contributed to conceptualization, data curation, investigation, formal analysis, resources & software, methodology, validation, and writing - original draft, review & editing. Young Shin Son contributed to data curation, investigation, resources & software, methodology, formal analysis, and validation. Kun Hyung Kim contributed to conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, and validation.

Data availability

Please contact the corresponding author for data availability.

Acknowledgments

None.

Figure 1.

PRISMA 2020 flowchart of study selection

CINAHL=Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health; DM=diabetes mellitus; HTR=hypertensive retinopathy; RISS= Research Information Sharing Service
rcphn-2024-00857f1.jpg
Table 1.
Keywords Used in This Study
MESH term English text word Korean text word
1. Hypertensive Retinopathy[Mesh] 1. “hypertensive retinopath*” 1. 고혈압 망막병증
2. (Hypertension[Mesh] OR blood pressure [Mesh]) AND (retinal diseases [Mesh]) 2. “hypertension retinopath*” 2. 고혈압 망막증
3. hypertensive AND (“retinopath*” OR “eye complication” OR “eye disease*” OR “macular oedema” OR “macular edema”)
4. hypertension AND (“retinopath*” OR “eye complication” OR “eye disease*” OR “macular oedema” OR “macular edema”)
5 (“optical coherence tomography” OR “OCT”) AND “hypertensive retinopath*”
6. (“optical coherence tomography angiography” OR “OCTA”) AND “hypertensive retinopath*”
1. Risk [Mesh] OR Risk Factors[Mesh] 1. “risk factor*” OR “associated factor*” OR “influencing factor*” 1. 위험요인, 위험인자
2. factor* AND (Risk OR associated OR influencing) 2. 관련요인, 영향요인
Table 2.
Critical Appraisal of Included Studies Using Joanna Briggs Institute(JBI) checklist Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus (N=11)
Population Author (year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
A.With DM Chen et al. (2017) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Kabedi et al. (2014) Y Y Y Y N N UC Y
Li et al. (2023) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
B. Without DM Adar et al. (2021) Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y
Chillo et al. (2019) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Cuspidi et al. (2005) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Kangwagye et al. (2018) Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y
Karadag et al. (2018) Y N Y Y Y Y UC Y
Ozer et al. (2021) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Thapa & Das (2023) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Zhang et al. (2019) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

DM=diabetes mellitus; N=no; UC=unclear; Y=yes

The JBI checklist included the following items: Q1=Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? Q2: Were the study participants and settings described in detail? Q3=Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable manner? Q4=Were objective standard criteria used to measure the condition? Q5=Were the confounding factors identified? Q6=Were strategies used to address the stated confounding factors? Q7=Were the measured outcomes valid and reliable? Q8=Was the appropriate statistical analysis used?

Table 3.
Characteristics of Included Studies Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus (N=11)
Author (year) Country Study design Participants: sample size, Exposure variables Outcome variable Associated factors (adjusted OR or linear coefficient, 95% CI, p-value)
Age (Mean±SD or median (range)),
HTN diagnostic criteria,
including or excluding DM
A.With DM
Chen (2017) China Cross-sectional study n= 12,966 Control Variables: Age, sex, region (Anqing/Lianyungang), treatment group(Enalapril Single/Combined), BMI, SBP, DBP, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, creatinine HTR • Serum uric acid (continuous) (OR=1.06, CI=1.02-1.10, p=.002)
Age=63.9±7.3 Independent Variables: Serum uric acid • Serum uric acid (quartiles, ≥6.5) (OR=1.21, CI=1.05-1.40, p=.008) (ref.≤4.4)
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg • Serum uric acid (binary, hyperuricemia) (OR=1.18, CI=1.05-1.33, p=.004)
Including DM
Kabedi (2014) Democratic Republic of Congo Cross-sectional study n=159 Age, sex, BMI, drinking (Alcoholism), smoking, family history (HTN, DM, stroke), SBP, DBP, LVH, CKD, stroke HTR • Age (>50) (OR=0.23, CI=0.06-0.97, p=.046)
Age=57.9±13.2 • Smoking (OR=0.1, CI=0.02-0.9, p=.035)
HTN: European Society of HTN /European Society of Cardiology guidelines • Presence of CKD (OR=4.4, CI=1.29-15.21, p =.018)
Including DM
Li (2023) China Cross-sectional study n=3,860 Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes, medication use, SBP, DBP, total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, uric acid, homocysteine, eGFR, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, use of folic acid, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase HTR • Urinary albumin to creatinine ratio§ (grade 2, β=2.62, CI=0.56-4.67, p=.013; grade 3, β=5.17, CI=1.13-9.20, p=.012)
Age=63.5±7.3 • Albuminuria§ (grade 1, OR=1.57, CI=1.08-2.29, p=.019; grade 2, OR=2.02, CI=1.28-3.18, p=.002)
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medication for HTN.
Including DM
B Without DM •  
Cuspidi (2005) United State Cross-sectional study n=2,172 Age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, HR, duration of Hypertension, overweight, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, hypertension medication, LVM, carotid IMT, urinary AE, LVH, CT, carotid plaque, microalbuminuria HTR • Male (OR=2.41, CI=1.01-4.53, p<.05)
Age=52.0±12.3 • LVH (OR=4.01, CI=1.99-8.06, p<.001)
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medications for HTN • Carotid IMT (OR=2.90, CI=1.37-6.12, p<.005)
Excluding DM • Carotid plaques (OR=2.81, CI=1.21-5.83, p<.005)
Kangwagye (2018) Uganda Cross-sectional study n=334 Age, sex, smoking, physical activity, diagnostic period of HTN, SBP, DBP, BMI, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, ACEI, β-blocker, calcium channel blocker, diuretic HTR • Age (>65yr) (OR=3.75, CI=2.07-5.39, p<.001)
Age=55(25-87) • Duration of HT (>5yr) (OR=3.73, CI=2.12-6.57, p<.001)
HT: BP≥140/90mmHg and/or medication for HTN • SBP (≥140mmHg) (OR=3.53, CI=1.99-6.24, p<.001)
Excluding DM • Use of β-blocker (OR=3.05, CI=1.68-5.53, p<.001)
• Use of calcium channel blocker (OR=2.16, CI=1.19-3.90, p=.011)
• Use of diuretic (OR=2.91, CI=1.68-5.04, p<.001)
Karadag (2018) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=560 Age, sex, HTN fluctuations (dipper/non-dipper based on >10% decrease in HTN overnight), SBP (24hr), DBP (24hr), fasting glucose, microalbuminuria, creatinine HTR • Age (OR=1.013, CI=1.001-1.025, p=.044)
Age=58.±13.3 • Non-dipping HT|| (OR=2.202, CI=1.408-3.443, p=.001)
HTN:BP≥140/90 mmHg • Presence of microalbuminuria (OR=2.043, CI=1.223-3.414, p=.006)
Excluding DM • Creatinine (OR=10.463, CI=2.447-44.735, p=.002)
Zhang (2019) China Cross-sectional study n=228 Age, sex, duration of HTN, BMI, family history of hypertension, smoking, SBP, DBP, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, Apo A, Apo B, endothelin-1 HTR • Hypertension duration (OR=0.975, CI=0.962-0.988, p<.001)
Age=58.10±9.67(HTR), 58.23±11.36(No-HTR) • Endoterin-1 (OR=1.210, CI=1.144-1.278, p<.001)
HTN:WHO/ISH1999 guidelines(1999)
Ozer (2022) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=73 Age, sex, dyslipidemia, current smoking, ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, fasting glucose, creatinine, total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, HDL, CRP, hemoglobin HTR • LDL (OR=1.016, CI=1.001-1.031, p=.043)
Age=55.2±8.2 • Epicardial adipose thickness (OR=1.674, CI=1.069-2.626, p=.024)
HTN: European Society of Cardiology HTN guideline (2018)
Excluding DM
Thapa (2023) Nepal Cross-sectional study n=312 Age, sex, occupation, education level, economic status, and residence (urban or rural), smoking history, alcohol history, duration of hypertension, literacy, mental stress, socio-economic status, hyperlipidemia, cardiac disease, CNS problems, kidney problems, target organ involvement HTR • Presence of hyperlipidemia (OR=2.364, CI=1.051-5.320, p=.038)
Age=63.68±12.63
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg,
or medication for HTN
Excluding DM
Chillo (2019) Tanzania Cross-sectional study n=224 Age, sex, CKD stage, hypertension grade, alcohol intake ≥grade II HTR • Severe CKD: stage 4(OR=4.28, CI=1.56-11.74, p=.005), stage 5 (OR=8.62, CI=3.56-20.87, p<.001) (ref. stage 3)
Age=45.8±14.3 • Higher BP levels: Grade I(OR=2.67, CI=1.18-6.05, p=.018), Grade III (OR=2.51, CI=1.09-5.80, p=.031)(ref. Normal/controlled)
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medication for HTN. HTN was categorized as grade I (140–159/90–99 mmHg), grade II (160–179/100–109mmHg), and grade III (≥180/≥110 mmHg) • Alcohol use (OR=2.08, CI= 1.09-3.97, p=.026).
Excluding DM
Adar (2021) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=495 Age, glucose, SBP, DBP, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, HTR • Presence of Aortic arch calcification (OR=13.128, CI=7.894–21.832, p<.05)
Age=62.7±11.1 LVM index, presence of aortic arch calcification, eGFR • Serum glucose levels (OR= 1.020, CI=1.003–1.037, p<.05)
HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, and/or medication for HTN
Excluding DM

ACEI=angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AE=albumin excretion; ApoA=apolipoprotein A; ApoB=apolipoprotein; BMI=body mass index; BUN=blood urea nitrogen; CI=confidence interval; CKD=chronic kidney disease; CNS=central nervous system; CP=carotid plaques; CT=common carotid intima media thickening; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; DL=dyslipidemia; DM=diabetes mellitus; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; FBS=fasting blood sugar; Hb=hemoglobin; HbA1c=hemoglobin A1C; HC=Hypercholesterolemia; HDLC=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HL=hyperlipidemia; HOMA-IR=homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; HR=heart rate; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HTN=hypertension; HTR=hypertensive retinopathy; IMT=intima media thickening; LDLC=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVH=left ventricular hypertrophy; LVM=left ventricular mass; MA=microalbuminuria; SBP=systolic blood pressure; OR=odds ratio; TC=total cholesterol; TGs=triglycerides; TSH=thyroid stimulating hormone

It is adjusted for age, sex, study center, treatment group, body mass index (BMI), SBP, DBP, creatinine, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose.

It is adjusted for diabetes.

§It is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, MTHFR C677T polymorphisms, TCHO, TG, FBG, eGFR, folate, HCY, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and the use of antihypertensive medicine.

||It is adjusted for age, sex, and microalbuminuria.

Table 4.
Summary of Associated Factors for Hypertensive Retinopathy Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus (N=11)
Category With DM (adjusted OR or linear coefficient, 95% CI; ref) Without DM (adjusted OR, 95%CI; ref)
General characteristics Age group(>50yr: 0.23, 0.06-0.97; Kabedi et al, 2014) Age group (>65yr: 3.75, 2.07-5.39; Kangwagye et al., 2018; 1.013 per 1 yr, 1.001-1.025; Karadag et al., 2018), Male (2.41, 1.01-4.53, Cuspidi,2005), Alcohol intake (2.08, 1.09-3.97; Chillo et al., 2019)
Current smoking status(0.1, 0.02-0.9; Kabedi et al, 2014)
Blood pressure SBP (≥140mmHg: 3.53, 1.99-6.24; Kangwagye et al.,2018), Higher BP levels (Grade I: 2.67, 1.18-6.05, Grade III: 2.51, 1.09-5.80; Chillo et al., 2019), Non-dipping hypertension|| (2.202, 1.408-3.443; Karadag et al., 2018), Period of HTN (>5yr: 3.73, 2.12-6.57; Kangwagye et al.,2018; 0.975 per 1 month, 0.962-0988; Zhang et al., 2019)
Blood glucose Serum glucose levels (1.020 per 1mg/dl, 1.003–1.037; Adar et al., 2021)
Dyslipidemia LDLC (1.016 per 1mg/dl, 1.001-1.031; Ozer et al. ,2021), Hyperlipidemia, (2.364, 1.051-5.320; Thapa & Das, 2023)
Heart disease ET-1 (1.210 per 1 ng/l, 1.144-1.278; Zhang et al., 2019), Epicardial adipose thickness (1.674 per 1mm, 1.069-2.626; Ozer et al, 2021), LVH (4.01 per 1%, 1.99-8.06; Cuspidi, 2005), Carotid IMT (2.90 per 1mm, 1.37-6.12; Cuspidi, 2005), Carotid plaques (2.81 per 1%, 1.21-5.83, Cuspidi, 2005), Presence of Aortic arch calcification (13.128, 7.894–21.832; Adar et al., 2021)
Kidney disease Presence of CKD (4.4, 1.29-15.21; Kabedi et al, 2014), UACR (grade2: β = 2.62, 0.56-4.67, grade3: β= 5.17, 1.13-9.20; Li et al. 2023), Albuminuria (grade1: 1.57, 1.08-2.29, grade2 :2.02, 1.28-3.18; Li et al. 2023), Serum uric acid§ (continuous) (1.06, 1.02-1.10; Chen et al., 2017), Serum uric acid§ (quartiles, ≥6.5) (1.21, 1.05-1.40; Chen et al., 2017) (ref.≤4.4), Serum uric acid§ (binary, hyperuricemia) (1.18, 1.05-1.33; Chen et al., 2017) CKD (stage 4: 4.28, 1.56-11.74, stage 5: 8.62, 3.56-20.87, ref. stage 3; Chillo et al., 2019), Creatinine (10.463 per 1mg/dl, 2.447-44.735; Karadag et al., 2018), Presence of microalbuminuria (2.043, 1.223-3.414; Karadag et al., 2018)
Medication Use of diuretics (2.91, 1.68-5.04; Kangwagye et al., 2018), Use of β-blocker (3.05, 1.68-5.53; Kangwagye et al., 2018), Use of calcium channel blocker(2.16, 1.19-3.90; Kangwagye et al., 2018)

BP= blood pressure; CI=confidence interval; CKD=chronic kidney disease; DM=diabetes mellitus; ET-1=endothelin 1; IMT=intima-media thickening; LDLC=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVH=left ventricular hypertrophy; OR=odds ratio; ref=reference; SBP=systolic blood pressure; UACR=urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; yr=year

It is adjusted for diabetes.

It is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, MTHFR C677T polymorphisms, TCHO, TG, FBG, eGFR, folate, HCY, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and the use of antihypertensive medicine.

§It is adjusted for age, sex, study center, treatment group, body mass index (BMI), SBP, DBP, creatinine, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose.

||It is adjusted for age, sex, and microalbuminuria.

Appendix 1.
PRISMA 2020 Checklist
rcphn-2024-00857-app1.pdf
Appendix 2.
PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts Checklist
rcphn-2024-00857-app2.pdf
Appendix 3.
Search Strategy
rcphn-2024-00857-app3.pdf
Appendix 4.
List of reviewed articles in systematic review
rcphn-2024-00857-app4.pdf

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Figure
      • 0
      We recommend
      Related articles
      Factors associated with Hypertensive Retinopathy among People with Hypertension: A Systematic Review
      Image
      Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flowchart of study selectionCINAHL=Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health; DM=diabetes mellitus; HTR=hypertensive retinopathy; RISS= Research Information Sharing Service
      Factors associated with Hypertensive Retinopathy among People with Hypertension: A Systematic Review
      MESH term English text word Korean text word
      1. Hypertensive Retinopathy[Mesh] 1. “hypertensive retinopath*” 1. 고혈압 망막병증
      2. (Hypertension[Mesh] OR blood pressure [Mesh]) AND (retinal diseases [Mesh]) 2. “hypertension retinopath*” 2. 고혈압 망막증
      3. hypertensive AND (“retinopath*” OR “eye complication” OR “eye disease*” OR “macular oedema” OR “macular edema”)
      4. hypertension AND (“retinopath*” OR “eye complication” OR “eye disease*” OR “macular oedema” OR “macular edema”)
      5 (“optical coherence tomography” OR “OCT”) AND “hypertensive retinopath*”
      6. (“optical coherence tomography angiography” OR “OCTA”) AND “hypertensive retinopath*”
      1. Risk [Mesh] OR Risk Factors[Mesh] 1. “risk factor*” OR “associated factor*” OR “influencing factor*” 1. 위험요인, 위험인자
      2. factor* AND (Risk OR associated OR influencing) 2. 관련요인, 영향요인
      Population Author (year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
      A.With DM Chen et al. (2017) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Kabedi et al. (2014) Y Y Y Y N N UC Y
      Li et al. (2023) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      B. Without DM Adar et al. (2021) Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Chillo et al. (2019) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Cuspidi et al. (2005) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Kangwagye et al. (2018) Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y
      Karadag et al. (2018) Y N Y Y Y Y UC Y
      Ozer et al. (2021) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Thapa & Das (2023) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Zhang et al. (2019) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
      Author (year) Country Study design Participants: sample size, Exposure variables Outcome variable Associated factors (adjusted OR or linear coefficient, 95% CI, p-value)
      Age (Mean±SD or median (range)),
      HTN diagnostic criteria,
      including or excluding DM
      A.With DM
      Chen (2017) China Cross-sectional study n= 12,966 Control Variables: Age, sex, region (Anqing/Lianyungang), treatment group(Enalapril Single/Combined), BMI, SBP, DBP, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, creatinine HTR • Serum uric acid (continuous) (OR=1.06, CI=1.02-1.10, p=.002)
      Age=63.9±7.3 Independent Variables: Serum uric acid • Serum uric acid (quartiles, ≥6.5) (OR=1.21, CI=1.05-1.40, p=.008) (ref.≤4.4)
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg • Serum uric acid (binary, hyperuricemia) (OR=1.18, CI=1.05-1.33, p=.004)
      Including DM
      Kabedi (2014) Democratic Republic of Congo Cross-sectional study n=159 Age, sex, BMI, drinking (Alcoholism), smoking, family history (HTN, DM, stroke), SBP, DBP, LVH, CKD, stroke HTR • Age (>50) (OR=0.23, CI=0.06-0.97, p=.046)
      Age=57.9±13.2 • Smoking (OR=0.1, CI=0.02-0.9, p=.035)
      HTN: European Society of HTN /European Society of Cardiology guidelines • Presence of CKD (OR=4.4, CI=1.29-15.21, p =.018)
      Including DM
      Li (2023) China Cross-sectional study n=3,860 Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes, medication use, SBP, DBP, total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, uric acid, homocysteine, eGFR, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, use of folic acid, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase HTR • Urinary albumin to creatinine ratio§ (grade 2, β=2.62, CI=0.56-4.67, p=.013; grade 3, β=5.17, CI=1.13-9.20, p=.012)
      Age=63.5±7.3 • Albuminuria§ (grade 1, OR=1.57, CI=1.08-2.29, p=.019; grade 2, OR=2.02, CI=1.28-3.18, p=.002)
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medication for HTN.
      Including DM
      B Without DM •  
      Cuspidi (2005) United State Cross-sectional study n=2,172 Age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, HR, duration of Hypertension, overweight, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, hypertension medication, LVM, carotid IMT, urinary AE, LVH, CT, carotid plaque, microalbuminuria HTR • Male (OR=2.41, CI=1.01-4.53, p<.05)
      Age=52.0±12.3 • LVH (OR=4.01, CI=1.99-8.06, p<.001)
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medications for HTN • Carotid IMT (OR=2.90, CI=1.37-6.12, p<.005)
      Excluding DM • Carotid plaques (OR=2.81, CI=1.21-5.83, p<.005)
      Kangwagye (2018) Uganda Cross-sectional study n=334 Age, sex, smoking, physical activity, diagnostic period of HTN, SBP, DBP, BMI, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, ACEI, β-blocker, calcium channel blocker, diuretic HTR • Age (>65yr) (OR=3.75, CI=2.07-5.39, p<.001)
      Age=55(25-87) • Duration of HT (>5yr) (OR=3.73, CI=2.12-6.57, p<.001)
      HT: BP≥140/90mmHg and/or medication for HTN • SBP (≥140mmHg) (OR=3.53, CI=1.99-6.24, p<.001)
      Excluding DM • Use of β-blocker (OR=3.05, CI=1.68-5.53, p<.001)
      • Use of calcium channel blocker (OR=2.16, CI=1.19-3.90, p=.011)
      • Use of diuretic (OR=2.91, CI=1.68-5.04, p<.001)
      Karadag (2018) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=560 Age, sex, HTN fluctuations (dipper/non-dipper based on >10% decrease in HTN overnight), SBP (24hr), DBP (24hr), fasting glucose, microalbuminuria, creatinine HTR • Age (OR=1.013, CI=1.001-1.025, p=.044)
      Age=58.±13.3 • Non-dipping HT|| (OR=2.202, CI=1.408-3.443, p=.001)
      HTN:BP≥140/90 mmHg • Presence of microalbuminuria (OR=2.043, CI=1.223-3.414, p=.006)
      Excluding DM • Creatinine (OR=10.463, CI=2.447-44.735, p=.002)
      Zhang (2019) China Cross-sectional study n=228 Age, sex, duration of HTN, BMI, family history of hypertension, smoking, SBP, DBP, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, Apo A, Apo B, endothelin-1 HTR • Hypertension duration (OR=0.975, CI=0.962-0.988, p<.001)
      Age=58.10±9.67(HTR), 58.23±11.36(No-HTR) • Endoterin-1 (OR=1.210, CI=1.144-1.278, p<.001)
      HTN:WHO/ISH1999 guidelines(1999)
      Ozer (2022) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=73 Age, sex, dyslipidemia, current smoking, ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, fasting glucose, creatinine, total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, HDL, CRP, hemoglobin HTR • LDL (OR=1.016, CI=1.001-1.031, p=.043)
      Age=55.2±8.2 • Epicardial adipose thickness (OR=1.674, CI=1.069-2.626, p=.024)
      HTN: European Society of Cardiology HTN guideline (2018)
      Excluding DM
      Thapa (2023) Nepal Cross-sectional study n=312 Age, sex, occupation, education level, economic status, and residence (urban or rural), smoking history, alcohol history, duration of hypertension, literacy, mental stress, socio-economic status, hyperlipidemia, cardiac disease, CNS problems, kidney problems, target organ involvement HTR • Presence of hyperlipidemia (OR=2.364, CI=1.051-5.320, p=.038)
      Age=63.68±12.63
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg,
      or medication for HTN
      Excluding DM
      Chillo (2019) Tanzania Cross-sectional study n=224 Age, sex, CKD stage, hypertension grade, alcohol intake ≥grade II HTR • Severe CKD: stage 4(OR=4.28, CI=1.56-11.74, p=.005), stage 5 (OR=8.62, CI=3.56-20.87, p<.001) (ref. stage 3)
      Age=45.8±14.3 • Higher BP levels: Grade I(OR=2.67, CI=1.18-6.05, p=.018), Grade III (OR=2.51, CI=1.09-5.80, p=.031)(ref. Normal/controlled)
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, or medication for HTN. HTN was categorized as grade I (140–159/90–99 mmHg), grade II (160–179/100–109mmHg), and grade III (≥180/≥110 mmHg) • Alcohol use (OR=2.08, CI= 1.09-3.97, p=.026).
      Excluding DM
      Adar (2021) Republic of Türkiye Cross-sectional study n=495 Age, glucose, SBP, DBP, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, HTR • Presence of Aortic arch calcification (OR=13.128, CI=7.894–21.832, p<.05)
      Age=62.7±11.1 LVM index, presence of aortic arch calcification, eGFR • Serum glucose levels (OR= 1.020, CI=1.003–1.037, p<.05)
      HTN: BP≥140/90 mmHg, and/or medication for HTN
      Excluding DM
      Category With DM (adjusted OR or linear coefficient, 95% CI; ref) Without DM (adjusted OR, 95%CI; ref)
      General characteristics Age group(>50yr: 0.23, 0.06-0.97; Kabedi et al, 2014) Age group (>65yr: 3.75, 2.07-5.39; Kangwagye et al., 2018; 1.013 per 1 yr, 1.001-1.025; Karadag et al., 2018), Male (2.41, 1.01-4.53, Cuspidi,2005), Alcohol intake (2.08, 1.09-3.97; Chillo et al., 2019)
      Current smoking status(0.1, 0.02-0.9; Kabedi et al, 2014)
      Blood pressure SBP (≥140mmHg: 3.53, 1.99-6.24; Kangwagye et al.,2018), Higher BP levels (Grade I: 2.67, 1.18-6.05, Grade III: 2.51, 1.09-5.80; Chillo et al., 2019), Non-dipping hypertension|| (2.202, 1.408-3.443; Karadag et al., 2018), Period of HTN (>5yr: 3.73, 2.12-6.57; Kangwagye et al.,2018; 0.975 per 1 month, 0.962-0988; Zhang et al., 2019)
      Blood glucose Serum glucose levels (1.020 per 1mg/dl, 1.003–1.037; Adar et al., 2021)
      Dyslipidemia LDLC (1.016 per 1mg/dl, 1.001-1.031; Ozer et al. ,2021), Hyperlipidemia, (2.364, 1.051-5.320; Thapa & Das, 2023)
      Heart disease ET-1 (1.210 per 1 ng/l, 1.144-1.278; Zhang et al., 2019), Epicardial adipose thickness (1.674 per 1mm, 1.069-2.626; Ozer et al, 2021), LVH (4.01 per 1%, 1.99-8.06; Cuspidi, 2005), Carotid IMT (2.90 per 1mm, 1.37-6.12; Cuspidi, 2005), Carotid plaques (2.81 per 1%, 1.21-5.83, Cuspidi, 2005), Presence of Aortic arch calcification (13.128, 7.894–21.832; Adar et al., 2021)
      Kidney disease Presence of CKD (4.4, 1.29-15.21; Kabedi et al, 2014), UACR (grade2: β = 2.62, 0.56-4.67, grade3: β= 5.17, 1.13-9.20; Li et al. 2023), Albuminuria (grade1: 1.57, 1.08-2.29, grade2 :2.02, 1.28-3.18; Li et al. 2023), Serum uric acid§ (continuous) (1.06, 1.02-1.10; Chen et al., 2017), Serum uric acid§ (quartiles, ≥6.5) (1.21, 1.05-1.40; Chen et al., 2017) (ref.≤4.4), Serum uric acid§ (binary, hyperuricemia) (1.18, 1.05-1.33; Chen et al., 2017) CKD (stage 4: 4.28, 1.56-11.74, stage 5: 8.62, 3.56-20.87, ref. stage 3; Chillo et al., 2019), Creatinine (10.463 per 1mg/dl, 2.447-44.735; Karadag et al., 2018), Presence of microalbuminuria (2.043, 1.223-3.414; Karadag et al., 2018)
      Medication Use of diuretics (2.91, 1.68-5.04; Kangwagye et al., 2018), Use of β-blocker (3.05, 1.68-5.53; Kangwagye et al., 2018), Use of calcium channel blocker(2.16, 1.19-3.90; Kangwagye et al., 2018)
      Table 1. Keywords Used in This Study

      Table 2. Critical Appraisal of Included Studies Using Joanna Briggs Institute(JBI) checklist Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus† (N=11)

      DM=diabetes mellitus; N=no; UC=unclear; Y=yes

      The JBI checklist included the following items: Q1=Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? Q2: Were the study participants and settings described in detail? Q3=Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable manner? Q4=Were objective standard criteria used to measure the condition? Q5=Were the confounding factors identified? Q6=Were strategies used to address the stated confounding factors? Q7=Were the measured outcomes valid and reliable? Q8=Was the appropriate statistical analysis used?

      Table 3. Characteristics of Included Studies Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus (N=11)

      ACEI=angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AE=albumin excretion; ApoA=apolipoprotein A; ApoB=apolipoprotein; BMI=body mass index; BUN=blood urea nitrogen; CI=confidence interval; CKD=chronic kidney disease; CNS=central nervous system; CP=carotid plaques; CT=common carotid intima media thickening; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; DL=dyslipidemia; DM=diabetes mellitus; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; FBS=fasting blood sugar; Hb=hemoglobin; HbA1c=hemoglobin A1C; HC=Hypercholesterolemia; HDLC=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HL=hyperlipidemia; HOMA-IR=homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; HR=heart rate; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HTN=hypertension; HTR=hypertensive retinopathy; IMT=intima media thickening; LDLC=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVH=left ventricular hypertrophy; LVM=left ventricular mass; MA=microalbuminuria; SBP=systolic blood pressure; OR=odds ratio; TC=total cholesterol; TGs=triglycerides; TSH=thyroid stimulating hormone

      It is adjusted for age, sex, study center, treatment group, body mass index (BMI), SBP, DBP, creatinine, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose.

      It is adjusted for diabetes.

      It is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, MTHFR C677T polymorphisms, TCHO, TG, FBG, eGFR, folate, HCY, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and the use of antihypertensive medicine.

      It is adjusted for age, sex, and microalbuminuria.

      Table 4. Summary of Associated Factors for Hypertensive Retinopathy Depending on the Presence of Diabetes Mellitus (N=11)

      BP= blood pressure; CI=confidence interval; CKD=chronic kidney disease; DM=diabetes mellitus; ET-1=endothelin 1; IMT=intima-media thickening; LDLC=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVH=left ventricular hypertrophy; OR=odds ratio; ref=reference; SBP=systolic blood pressure; UACR=urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; yr=year

      It is adjusted for diabetes.

      It is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, MTHFR C677T polymorphisms, TCHO, TG, FBG, eGFR, folate, HCY, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and the use of antihypertensive medicine.

      It is adjusted for age, sex, study center, treatment group, body mass index (BMI), SBP, DBP, creatinine, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose.

      It is adjusted for age, sex, and microalbuminuria.


      RCPHN : Research in Community and Public Health Nursing
      TOP