A Study on Fecal Incontinence and Depression of Rural Women

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2014;25(3):198-206
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.3.198
Department of Nursing, Sunmoon University, Asan, Korea.
Corresponding author: Kim, Eun Man. Department of Nursing, Sunmoon University, 100 Kalsan-ri, Tangjeong-myeon, Asan 336-708, Korea. Tel: +82-41-530-2756, Fax: +82-41-530-2767, kem7355@hanmail.net
Received 2014 June 12; Revised 2014 September 22; Accepted 2014 September 25.

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to identify the prevalence and influencing factors of fecal incontinence, and to analyze the association between fecal incontinence and depression.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 233 women living in rural areas, and data were collected using questionnaires from February 24 to May 30, 2012. Fecal incontinence was measured with the Continence Grading Score, and depression with the Geriatric Depression Scale. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS through χ2-test, Fisher's exact test, t-test and ANOVA.

Results

Of the subjects, 16.7% had fecal incontinence. The prevalence of fecal incontinence was higher in older women (χ2=23.55, p<.001), those with vaginal delivery (χ2=4.81, p=.049), those with parity of 4 or more (χ2=13.47, p=.003), and those with urinary incontinence (χ2=26.36, p<.001). The level of depression was significantly higher in older women (F=19.27, p<.001), those with low academic qualification (F=18.17, p<.001), those with urinary incontinence (F=4.15, p=.043), and those with fecal incontinence (F=14.90, p<.001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that there should be supports by public health care for fecal incontinence prevention and care programs in order to promote the physical and emotional health of rural women.

References

1. Mandelstam DA. Fecal incontinence. social and economic factors. In : Henry MM, Swash M, eds. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Pathophysiology and management London: Butterworth; 1984. p. 217–222.
2. Bharucha AE, Philips SF. Slow-transit constipation. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2001;4(4):309–315.
3. Bartlett L, Nowak M, Ho YH. Reasons for non-disclosure of faecal incontinence: A comparison between two survey methods. Tech coloproctol 2007;11(3):251–257.
4. Whitehead WE. Diagnosing and managing fecal incontinence: If you don't ask, they won't tell. Gastroenterology 2005;129(1):6.
5. Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES. Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013;19(2):66–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b013e31828016d3.
6. Park SH, Kang CB, Jang SY, Kim BY. Effect of kegel exercise to prevent urinary and fecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women: Systematic review. J Korean Acad Nurs 2013;43(3):420–430.
7. Rohwer K, Bliss DZ, Savik K. Incontinence-associated dermatitis in community-dwelling individuals with fecal incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2013;40(2):181–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e31827e8b3d.
8. Toglia MR, DeLancey JO. Anal incontinence and the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84(4 Pt 2):731–740.
9. Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G. Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery-a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988;27(1):27–32.
10. Bartlett L, Nowak M, Ho YH. Impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15(26):3276–3282. http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.3276.
11. Yip SO, Dick MA, McPencow AM, Martin DK, Ciarleglio MM, Erekson EA. The association between urinary and fecal incontinence and social isolation in older women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(2):146.e1–146.e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.010.
12. Smith TM, Menees SB, Xu X, Saad RJ, Chey WD, Fenner DE. Factors associated with quality of life among women with fecal incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24(3):493–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1889-6.
13. Halland M, Koloski NA, Jones M, Byles J, Chiarelli P, Forder P, et al. Prevalence correlates and impact of fecal incontinence among older women. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56(9):1080–1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829203a9.
14. Ditah I, Devaki P, Luma HN, Ditah C, Njei B, Jaiyeoba C, et al. Prevalence, trends, and risk factors for fecal incontinence in United states adults, 2005-2010. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12(4):636–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.020.
15. Yoon HW, Bae CS. A study female of fecal incontinence: Effects of parity & delivery method. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 1999;42(12):2749–2753.
16. Horng SS, Chou YJ, Huang N, Fang YT, Chou P. Fecal incontinence and epidemiology and help seeking among older people in Taiwan. Neurourol Urodyn 2014;33(7):1153–1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.22462.
17. Matthews CA, Whitehead WE, Townsend MK, Grodstein F. Risk factors for urinary, fecal, or dual incontinence in the nurses health study. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(3):539–545. http://dx.doi.org/10,1097/AOG.0b013e31829efbff.
18. Mon YJ, Lim HS, Jung JE, Cho HH, Kim MR, Lew YO, et al. Original artides: The effects of the number of normal vaginal deliveries to the function of low urogenital system. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2007;50(4):638–644.
19. Chang TC, Chang SR, Hsiao SM, Hsiao CF, Chen CH, Lin HH. Factors associated with fecal incontinence in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39(1):250–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01902.x.
20. Menees SB, Smith TM, Xu X, Saad RJ, Chey WD, Fenner DE. Factors associated with symptoms severity in women presenting with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56(1):97–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826f8773.
21. Kang HW. Prevalence and predictive factors of fecal incontinence [master's thesis] [Seoul]: Ewha Womens University; 2011. 38.
22. Chung SS, Park UC, Kim CK, Seong BG, Shin HJ, Choi YC, et al. Functional investigation with use of anorectal physiology in the patients with fecal incontinence. J Korean Surg Soc 1999;57Suppl. :996–1007.
23. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a short version. Clin Gerontol 1986;5:165–172.
24. Park SK, Myung SJ. Diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence. Korean J Med 2012;83(5):580–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2012.83.5.580.
25. Berger MB, Delancey JO, Fenner DE. Racial defferences in fecal incontinence in community-dwelling women from the EPI study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013;19(3):169–174. http://dx.doi.org/10,1097/SPV.0b013e3182874709.
26. Joh HK, Seong MK, Oh SW. Fecal Incontinence in Elderly Koreans. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(1):116–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02613.x.
27. Hwang JS, Park TH, Kim DK, Kang MA, Kim SM, Bae CS, et al. The prevalence of female urinary and fecal incontinence. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 1998;41(6):1552–1559.
28. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Halli AD, Jones RW, Richter HE, Redden DT, et al. Prevalence and correlates of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(4):629–635.
29. Wilson M. Living with fecal incontinence: Follow-up to a research project. Br J Nurs 2013;22(3):147–150. :152–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.3.147.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence (N=233)

Table 1

Table 2

The General Characteristics of Participants (N=233)

Table 2

Table 3

Differences in Fecal Incontinence according to General Characteristics (N=233)

Table 3

†Fisher's exact test.

Table 4

Differences in Depression according to General Characteristics (N=233)

Table 4

Table 5

Differences in Depression according to Fecal Incontinence (N=233)

Table 5