Clusters of Health-Promoting Schools in Middle and High Schools Based on the WHO Guidelines

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2013;24(3):282-291
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2013.24.3.282
1College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.
2College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Lee, In-Sook. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea. Tel: +82-2-740-8828, Fax: +82-2-766-1852, lisook@snu.ac.kr
Received 2013 January 15; Accepted 2013 August 22.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the Clusters of health promoting schools in middle and high schools for the Korean Youth Risk Behaviors Web-based Survey.

Methods

The tool of health promoting school was developed based on a framework for action for health promoting schools in World Health Organization and Schools Health Index for middle and high schools in the United States by 2 professionals and 2 health teachers and revised as a result of the preliminary study. Data were collected with a questionnaire from teachers who attended the conference run by Korean Centers for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention in 2009. The data of 363 schools were analyzed using descriptive analysis, t-test, and ANOVA.

Results

As a result of comparing the scores of health promoting schools, three Clusters were identified. The Clusters differed significantly in presence of health teacher, location, and type of schools (p<.05).

Conclusion

These results are a good reference in developing tailored strategies for health promoting schools, which will help improve health-promoting schools.

Notes

This study were supported by a research grant of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Serial Number: 2008-E00390-00).

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School Health Index: A self-assessment and planning guide. middle school/high school version Atlanta, GA: Authors; 2005. Retrieved April 20, 2012. from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/SHI.
2. Coggans N, Mckeller S. Health promoting schools-an investigation into the wider context of health education in schools Glasgow, Scotland: University of Strathclyde, Hobsons Publishing; 1995.
3. Hyman IA, Perone DC. The other side of school violence: Educator policies and practices that may contribute to student misbehavior. J Sch Psychol 1998;36(1):7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(97)87007-0.
4. Kim YI. A study of the index development and measurement for school health promoting behaviors. J Korean Soc Sch Health 1998;11(2):189–201.
5. Kim M. A research on the organizational and improvement method of health education at middle and high school Changwon: Changwon National University; 2009. Unpublished master's thesis.
6. Kim YS, Ha YM, Park HJ, Jung HS, Kwon EH. Survey on current state and strategies for strengthening school health education in elementary middle, and high schools in Seoul. Educ Cult Res 2011;17(3):353–374.
7. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Results of health risk behaviors among Korea adolescents 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2012. from http://yhs.cdc.go.kr/.
8. Lee A, Cheng FFK, Leger LS. Evaluating health-promoting schools in Hong Kong: Development of a framework. Health Promot Int 2005;20(2):177–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah607.
9. Lee A, Cheng FF, Yuen H, Ho M, Lo A, Fung Y, et al. Achieving good standards in health promoting schools: Preliminary analysis one year after the implementation of the Hong Kong healthy schools award scheme. Public Health 2007;121(10):752–760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2007.01.014.
10. Lee A, Wong MC, Keung VM, Yuen HS, Cheng F, Mok JS. Can the concept of health promoting schools help to improve students' health knowledge and practices to combat the challenge of communicable disease: Case study in Hong Kong? BMC Public Health 2008;8:42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-42.
11. Lee CY, Chung YS, Han JH, Lee CO, Kwon IS. Development and performance analysis of elementary school health promotion policy guideline. J Korean Community Nurs 2003;14(3):457–467.
12. Lee EY, Choi BY, Sohn AR, Ahn DH. Evaluation of health promoting school by school characteristics. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot 2009;26(3):85–96.
13. Lee MS, Park KO. School safety education factors predicting injury prevalence among Korean adolescence. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot 2004;21(2):147–165.
14. Lee EY, Park KO, Shin Y, Choi BY. Implementation status of related factors of health promoting schools among elementary, middle and high schools: Based on the WHO guidelines. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2012;29(1):109–120.
15. St Leger L. Australian teachers' understandings of the health promoting school concept and the implications for the development of school health. Health Promot Int 1998;13(3):223–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/13.3.223.
16. Lavin AT, Shapiro GR, Weill KS. Creating an agenda for school-based health promotion: A review of 25 selected reports. J Sch Health 1992;62(6):212–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1992.tb01231.x.
17. McGue M, Lacono WG, Krueger R. The association of early adolescent problem behavior and adult psychopathology: A multivariate behavioral genetic perspectives. Behav Genet 2006;36(4):591–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9061-z.
18. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Operation plan of project for models of health promoting schools 2012. 04. Retrieved January 11, 2013. from https://schoolhealth.kedi.re.kr/LuBoard/SHealth/SHDataBbsView.php?LstNum1=1441&PageNum=4&GbnCode=0101.
19. Moon A. Health promoting schools and healthy schools awards. Promot Educ 2002;Suppl 1. :25–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10253823020090010113.
20. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000;15(3):259–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
21. Park YS, Kim U. Psychological, behavioral, and relational characteristics of school violence: Comparative analysis of victims, bullies, non-participants of aggression. Korean J Psychol Soc Issues 2001;7(1):63–89.
22. Rogers E, Moon AM, Mullee MA, Speller VM, Roderick PJ. Developing the 'health-promoting school'-a national survey of healthy school awards. Public Health 1998;112(1):37–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ph.1900418.
23. Rowe F, Stewart D, Patterson C. Promoting school connectedness through whole school approaches. Health Educ 2007;107(6):524–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09654280710827920.
24. Sohn A, Kim B, Kim SH, Shin YJ, Ahn D, Choi BY. Evaluating health-promoting schools based on WHO standards in Yangpyung-gun, Korea. J Korean Soc Sch Health Educ 2008;9(1):1–15.
25. Statistics Korea. Causes of death 2011. Retrieved May 3, 2012. from http://kostat.go.kr.
26. World Health Organization. The Ottawa charter for health promotion Ottawa, Canada: WHO Regional Office; 1986.
27. World Health Organization. Health promoting schools: A framework for action Manila, Philippines: World Health Organization Western Pacific Region; 2009.
28. Shi-Chang X, Zhang X, Xu S, Tang S, Yu S, Carmen A, et al. Creating health-promoting schools in China with a focus on nutrition. Health Promot Int 2004;19(4):409–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah402.
29. Xu L, Pan B, Lin J, Chen L, Yu S, Jack J. Creating health-promoting schools in rural China: A project started from deworming. Health Promot Int 2000;15(3):197–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.197.
30. Xin-Wei Z, Liu L, Zhang X, Guo J, Pan X, Carmen A, et al. Health-promoting school development in Zhejiang Province, China. Health Promot Int 2008;23(3):220–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dan021.

Article information Continued

Funded by : Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Award ID : 2008-E00390-00

Figure 1

Mean score of each item in school health policies, physical and social environment of the school.

Figure 2

Mean score of each item in community links, action competencies for healthy living, and school health care and promotion services.

Table 1

Level of Performance on Items of 6 Elements for Health Promoting Schools

Table 1

HP=healthy school policies; PE=physical environment of the school; SE=social environment of the school; C=community links; AC=action competencies for healthy living; HS=school health care and promotion services.

Table 2

Characteristics of the Schools and Respondents

Table 2

Table 3

Comparison of Three Clusters by 6 Elements of Health Promoting School

Table 3

HP=healthy school policies; PE=physical environment of the school; SE=social environment of the school; C=community links; AC=action competencies for healthy living; HS=school health care and promotion services.

Post-hoc test: Scheffé test, subgroup (a, b, or c); ANOVA.

Table 4

Results of the Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis

Table 4