Influence of Experiences of Witnessing Tobacco Advertising and Preferences of Tobacco Companies' Social Responsibility on Current and Future Smoking Intentions in Adolescents

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2014;25(1):33-43
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.1.33
1Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea.
2Graduate School of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
3Youth No Smoking & Drinking Association, Seoul, Korea.
4Graduate School of Health Science & Social Welfare, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Shin, Sun Hwa. Graduate School of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, 275-33 Junghwa 1-dong, Jungnang-gu, Seoul 131-875, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3399-1593, Fax: +82-2-3399-1594, ffssh@hanmail.net
Received 2014 January 16; Revised 2014 February 19; Accepted 2014 March 21.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of experiences of witnessing tobacco advertising and preferences of tobacco companies' social responsibility (CSR) on current and future smoking intentions in adolescents.

Methods

Data were collected from 700 adolescents living in Korea representing 7 metropolitan cities and 8 provinces in the method of proportional random sampling. The Gallup's data collection system was adopted using 1:1 face to face interviews. The witness of tobacco advertising was determined by 'yes', or 'no' responses to three survey items and to four survey items for preferences of tobacco CSR. For statistical analysis, χ2 test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used.

Results

98.4% of the adolescents had experiences of witnessing tobacco advertising. POP (OR=103.44, 95% CI: 8.22~1301.45) and magazine advertisement (OR=6.07, 95% CI: 1.34~22.58) had a significant effect on their current smoking. Also, POP (β=.24, p<.001) and movie advertisement (β=.42, p<.001) had a significant effect on their future smoking intentions. As for the preferences of tobacco CSR, cultural-art support activities (β=.15, p=.025) and environmental purifying campaigns (β=-.15, p=.034) had a significant effect on their future smoking intentions.

Conclusion

Witness of tobacco advertising and positive responses to tobacco CSR are associated with current and future smoking intentions in adolescents.

Notes

This study was supported by Sahmyook University Research Fund in 2012.

References

1. Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention. Statistics of online survey of adolescent health behavior 2012 [Internet] Seoul: Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention; 2012. cited 2013 July 22. Available from: http://yhs.cdc.go.kr.
2. Lee S, Yun JE, Lee JK, Kim IS, Jee SH. The Korean prediction model for adolescents' future smoking intentions. J Prev Med Public Health 2010;43(4):283–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.4.283.
3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A study on the actual condition of the smoking in the second half of 2011 [Internet] Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2011. cited 2013 July 22. Available from http://www.kash.or.kr/user_new/pds_view.asp.
4. Park S. Smoking behavior and predictors of smoking initiation in childhood and early adolescence. J Korean Acad Nurs 2009;39(3):376–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.376.
5. Li L, Borland R, Fong GT, Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Cummings KM. Impact of point-of-sale tobacco display bans: Findings from the international tobacco control four country survey. Health Educ Res 2013;28(5):898–910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt058.
6. Korea Health Promotion Foundations. Monthly highlights: Ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Tobacco Control Issue Report [Internet] Seoul: Korea Health Promotion Foundations; 2013. 05. 18–15. cited 2013 October 23. Available from: http://www.khealth.or.kr/BoardType66.do?bid=64&mid=1&cmd=_view&dept=&bns=7&idx=7408.
7. Blecher E. The impact of tobacco advertising bans on consumption in developing countries. J Health Econ 2008;27(4):930–942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.010.
8. Health Promotion Law. Korea ministry of government legislation [Internet] Seoul: Health Promotion Law; 2012. cited 2013 October 23. Available from http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&p1=&subMenu=1&nwYn=1&query=%EA%B5%AD%EB%AF%BC%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%95%EC%A6%9D%EC%A7%84%EB%B2%95+%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EB%A0%B9&x=0&y=0#liBgcolor0.
9. Lee HH. National tobacco control programmes. Health Welf Policy Forum 2007;129:6–21.
10. Park SO. National policy for adolescent smoking prevention and cessation. Health and Welfare Policy Forum 2007;129:22–34.
11. Min TW. Seoul city and ministry of health and welfare ignores illegal cigarette promotion [Internet] Kukinews; 2013. 06. 09. cited 2013 October 26. Sect.01. Available from http://news.kukinews.com/article/view.asp?page=1&gCode=kmi&arcid=0007259474&cp=du.
12. Lee KB. KT & G invests into corporate social responsibility [Internet] Munwha Daily News; 2013. 10. 24. cited 2013 October 24. Sect.01. Available from http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=2013102401031824152002.
13. Hanewinkel R, Isensee B, Sargent JD, Morgenstern M. Cigarette advertising and teen smoking initiation. Pediatrics 2011;127(2):e271–e278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2934.
14. Gilpin EA, White MM, Messer K, Pierce JP. Receptivity to tobacco advertising and promotions among young adolescents as a predictor of established smoking in young adulthood. Am J Public Health 2007;97(8):1489–1495.
15. Joe HO. The effects of cigarette companys image advertising on public cigarette consumption. Health Welf Policy Forum 2005;105:83–91.
16. Oh MY. Influence of smoking perception and attitude on the image of tobacco Company and the perception of its CSR activities. Speech Commun 2010;13:145–183.
17. Choi JM. The effect of on-screen smoking on adolescent smoking initiation - vicarious functional learning about smoking via the empathy toward the smoking character. Korean J Broadcasting 2009;23(2):526–566.
18. Tak JY. A study on the effects of magazine cigarette advertising on consumers' social behaviors. Advert Res 2002;57:195–222.
19. Shin SR, Jeong GC, Lee BK. The influence of cigarette advertising and susceptibility to smoking on adulthood smoking intention. Korean J Youth Stud 2012;19(10):1–22.
20. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39(2):175–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
21. Kim BC, Lee CH. A study of tobacco company's corporate social responsibility effects. Korean J Advert Public Relat 2011;139(4):5–37.
22. Sussman S, Miyano J, Rohrbach LA, Dent CW, Sun P. Six-month and one-year effects of project EX-4: A classroom-based smoking prevention and cessation intervention program. Addict Behav 2007;32(12):3005–3014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.016.
23. Lovato C, Linn G, Stead LF, Best A. Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(4):CD003439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003439.
24. Perez DA, Grunseit AC, Rissel C, Kite J, Cotter T, Dunlop S, et al. Tobacco promotion 'below-the-line': Exposure among adolescents and young adults in NSW, Australia. BMC Public Health 2012;12:429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-429.
25. Kim YH, Hoe MS. Examination of the effectiveness of an adolescent smoking prevention program criticizing cigarette advertisements. J Sch Soc Work 2011;21:267–296.
26. Sargent JD, Dalton M, Beach M, Bernhardt A, Heatherton T, Stevens M. Effect of cigarette promotions on smoking uptake among adolescents. Prev Med 2000;30(4):320–327.
27. Arora M, Stigler MH, Reddy K. Effectiveness of health promotion in preventing tobacco use among adolescents in India: Research evidence informs the national tobacco control programme in India. Glob Health Promot 2011;18(1):9–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757975910393163.

Article information Continued

Funded by : Sahmyook University

Table 1

General Characteristics and Smoking Rate (N=700)

Table 1

Table 2

Experience of Witnessing Tobacco Advertisements and Preferences of Tobacco Companies' Social Responsibility by General Characteristics (N=700)

Table 2

TA=tobacco advertisements; CSR=companies' social responsibility.

Fisher's exact test.

Table 3

Factors Influencing Participants' Current Smoking (N=700)

Table 3

TA=Tobacco advertisements; CSR=Companies' social responsibility; POP=Point of purchase; OR=Odds ratio; CI=95% confidence interval.

Table 4

Factors Influencing Participants' Future Smoking Intentions (N=700)

Table 4

TA=Tobacco advertisements; CSR=Companies' social responsibility; POP=Point of purchase.