Relations between Fatigue and Work-related Factors in Workers

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2011;22(4):420-428
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 April 04
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.4.420
1Full-time Lecturer, Department of Nursing, Munkyung College, Korea.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Kaya University, Korea.
Address reprint requests to: Cha, Nam Hyun, Department of Nursing, Kaya University, 208 Samgae-ro, Gimhea 621-748, Korea. Tel: 82-55-330-1141, Fax: 82-55-330-1142, yeoreo@daum.net
Received 2011 October 18; Revised 2011 December 11; Accepted 2011 December 11.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between fatigue and work-related factors in workers.

Methods

A total of 204 subjects aged between 21 and 59 were selected through convenient sampling. Data were collected with a self-reported questionnaire from May 20 to 31, 2011. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 17.0.

Results

Difference in fatigue according to general characteristics was significant according to duty type. Difference in fatigue according to occupational characteristics was significant according to work intensity, work speed, demand of work concentration, work space, physical environment, largest weight by hands, vibration, visual demand of work, difficulty of work practice, work stress, and rest hours in holiday. There was a positive correlation between fatigue and occupational characteristics. Stepwise multiple regression analyses showed that educational level, work intensity, and rest hours in holiday were the strongest factors associated with fatigue (R2=.363 p<.001). These factors explained fatigue by 36.3%.

Conclusion

The findings of this study may be useful in understanding workers' fatigue and developing more specific fatigue relief programs.

References

1. Ahn YH, Song NH, Jung ES, Yoo KS, Lee WY, Oh MS, et al. Community Nursing Seoul: Jungdam; 2009.
2. Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Kecklund G. Sleep disturbance, work stress and work hours a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:741–748.
3. Alfredsson L, Akerstedt M, Mattsson M, Wilborg B. Self-reported health and well-being amongst night security grades: A comparison with the working population. Ergonomics 1991;34:525–530.
4. Bültmann U, Kant IJ, van Amelsvoort LG, van den Brandt PA, Kasl SV. Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations: Results from the massastricht cohort study of fatigue at work. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43(11):976–983.
5. Carpenito LJ. Nursing diagnosis: Application to clinical practice Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1992.
6. Chang SJ. Standardization of collection and measurement of health statistics data Seoul: The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine; 2000.
7. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang MG, Hyun SJ, Cha BS, Park JK, et al. Correlates of self-rated fatigue in Korean employees. J Prev Med Public Health 2005;38(1):71–81.
8. Chen MK. The epidemiology of self-perceived fatigue among adults. Prev Med 1986;15:74–81.
9. Ha HJ. The comparative study on the industrial fatigue depending on the working condition among cooks in the hotel Suwon: Kyonggi University; 2006. Unpublished master's thesis.
10. Han DH, Lee JH. Occupational and hygienics Seoul: Shinkwang; 2004.
11. Hanlon T, Tabachnikova ED, Suresh S. Fatigue behavior of nanocrystalline metals and alloys. Int J Fatigue 2005;27:1149.
12. Jang JH, Kang D, Koh SB, Kim J, Cho BM, Lee SI. Work related factors affecting perceived fatigue in male metal assemblers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2004;16(2):155–165.
13. Kang JW, Hong YS, Lee HJ, Yeah BJ, Kim JI, Kim JM, et al. Factors affecting fatigue and stress in male manufacturing workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2005;17(2):129–137.
14. Kant IJ, Bültmann U, Schröer KA, Beurskens AJ, Van Amelsvoort LG, Swaen GM. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 2003;60Suppl 1. :i32–i39.
15. Kwon YN. A study of MSDs and their policy reform for workers in healthcare and medical fields Seoul: Seoul National University of Technology; 2008. Unpublished master's thesis.
16. Lee HK. A study on the crew's fatigue Busan: Korea Maritime University; 1999. Unpublished master's thesis.
17. Lee KS, Lee DB, Kwon IS, Cho YC. Depressive symptoms and their association with sleep quality, occupational stress and fatigue among small-scaled manufacturing male workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2011;23(2):99–111.
18. Li G, Bucke P. The development of a practical method for the exposure assessment of risks to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (General report to the HSE. No. R3408) Wimbledon London: Robens Centre for Health Ergonomics, European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences; 1998.
19. Lee NW. Occupational hygienic management Seoul: Shinkwang; 1998.
20. Oh YA, Lee MS, Rhee KY. Relationship between Manufacturing Workers'Job Conditions and Stress. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2002;14(3):301–314.
21. Park GH. Occupational and Hygiene management Seoul: Dongwha; 2004.
22. Park NK, Kim JY, Cho YC, Lee DB. Relationship Between Fatigue Symptomes and Life Style Factors Among Industrial Workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1998;10(2):214–226.
23. Schwartz JE, Jandorf L, Krupp LB. The measurement of fatigue: A new instrument. J Psychosom Res 1993;37(7):753–762.
24. Sluiter JK, Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH. The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: A study on coach drivers. Ergonomics 1999;42:573–583.
25. Sluiter JK, de Croon EM, Meijman TF, Frings-Dresen MH. Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints. Occup Environ Med 2003;60Suppl 1. :i62–i70.
26. Smith L, Folkard S, Tucker P. Work shift duration: A review comparing eight hour and 12 hour shift systems. Occup Environ Med 1998;55:217–229.
27. Swaen GM, van Amelsvoort LG, Bültmann U, Kant IJ. Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med 2003;60Suppl 1. :i88–i92.
28. Wang MJ, Cho SJ, Cho YH, Park IH, Koh JE, Choi HJ, et al. Community Nursing Seoul: Hyunmunsa; 2010.
29. Weijman I, Ros WJ, Rutten GE, Schaufeli WB, Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JA. Fatigue in employees with diabetes: its relation with work characteristics and diabetes related burden. Occup Environ Med 2003;60Suppl 1. :i93–i98.
30. Yang IA. Study on subjective symptom of fatigue in unmarried woman workers Gwangju: Chonnam University; 1990. Unpublished master's thesis.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Differences in Multidimensional Fatigue by General Characteristics (N=204)

Table 1

Table 2

Differences in Multidimensional Fatigue by Occupational Characteristics (N=204)

Table 2

Table 3

Correlations between Multidimensional Fatigue and General and Occupational Characteristics (N=204)

Table 3

Table 4

Affected Factors on Fatigue and by Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis (N=204)

Table 4