The Relations among ADL, Self-efficacy, Physical Activity and Cognitive Function in Korean Elders

Article information

Res Community Public Health Nurs. 2010;21(1):101-109
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 April 04
doi : https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.1.101
Professor, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University.
Address reprint requests to: Wang, Myoung Ja, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea. Tel: 82-2-961-9426, Fax: 82-2-961-9398, chundang@khu.ac.kr
Received 2010 February 01; Revised 2010 March 11; Accepted 2010 March 11.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was to identify the relations among ADL, self-efficacy, physical activity and cognitive function in elders.

Methods

A total of 257 subjects aged between 60 and 92 were selected through convenient sampling. Data were collected with a self-reported questionnaire from January 10 to February 28, 2009. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 15.0.

Results

Differences in ADL, self-efficacy, physical activity, and cognitive functions according to general characteristics were as follows. ADL was significantly different according to age, cohabitation, recognition on health, and successful aging. Self-efficacy was significantly different according to cohabitation, recognition on health, and successful aging. Physical activity was significantly different according to age, educational level, cohabitation, and cognition on health. Cognitive function was significantly different according to age, educational level, job, and recognition on health. The correlation coefficient (r) of the ADL variables was .565 for self-efficacy, .633 for physical activity and .460 for cognitive function.

Conclusion

Findings of this study may be useful in understanding the health status of community-dwelling elders and developing more specific health promotion programs.

References

1. Cho BE. Intergenerational family solidarity and life satisfaction among Korean aged parents. J Korea Gerontol Soc 1990;10(1):105–124.
2. Choi JH, Kim HJ, Lee GM, Kim KS. The effect of sports participation on the status of physical health and depression in the aged. J Phys Educ Lifetime Sport Sci 1999;11:63–77.
3. Chun JW, Park MS. A test of causal model for motivation for job performance, job satisfaction and psychological well-being of the elderly. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2006;26(3):521–545.
4. Crosnoe R, Elder GH. Successful adaptation in the later years. Soc Psychol Q 2002;65(4):309–328.
5. Jang HS. SOC strategies and life-satisfaction in middle and later adulthood. Korean J Psychol Gen 2007;20(2):131–144.
6. Jung HY. A comparative study of factors influencing the life satisfaction of the vulnerable aged group Daejeon: Mokwon University; 2002. Unpublished master's thesis.
7. Kim CG, Jang HJ, Kim SS. The correlation between ability of activity in daily living and self-care agency among elderly in Chunchon province. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2001;13(1):40–52.
8. Kim IK, Kim DB, Mo SH, Park KS, Lee YS, Cho SN. Life of Korean elderly: Diagnosis and prospect Seoul: Future Manpower Study Center; 1999.
9. Kim JE. A study on the mental health and regular exercise of the aged: based on the secondary data of '2007 Korea national health and nutrition survey Seoul: Urban Science University; 2009. Unpublished master's thesis.
10. Kim JH, Jung YM. A study on the health age, activity daily of living and cognitive function of the elderly. J Korean Gerontol Nurs 2001;13(1):22–31.
11. Kim MH, Shin KR. The study of the development of the successful aging scale for Korean elderly. J Korea Gerontol Soc 2005;25(2):35–52.
12. Kim TH. Cross-cultural study on family solidarity, filial piety and depression among the elderly. J Korea Gerontol Soc 1999;19(2):79–96.
13. Kim UJ. A comparative study on daily life activity and life satisfaction between the elderly at an institution and those at home: Focused on Chungcheongbuk-Do Chongju: Chongju University; 2001. Unpublished master's thesis.
14. Kwak MS. A study of factors influencing successful aging Seoul: Korean Baptist Theological University; 2004. Unpublished master's thesis.
15. Lee GO. A structural analysis of successful aging factors of rural elders Seoul: Seoul National University; 2007. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
16. Lee MR. Study of health promoting lifestyle of collegestudents. J Nurs Acad Soc 1997;27(1):156–168.
17. Min KJ. A study on the effect of the daily activities on the quality of life for the aged Seoul: Hansung University; 2006. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
18. Oh KH. A study on older people's activities of daily living and their life satisfaction. -focused on availability degree of senior welfare center- Chongju: Chongju University; 2002. Unpublished master's thesis.
19. Park EH, Kim SK, Lee HG, Seo YS, Kim DH, Shin DH, et al. Cognitive function, family function and depression in rural elderly. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1997;18(8):814–823.
20. Park MH, Ko JK, Kim ES, Kim HJ, Paik JS, Yang HJ, et al. Geriatric Nursing Seoul: Jungdam Media Pub; 2004.
21. Pender NJ, Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Frank-Stromborg M. Predicting health-promoting lifestyle in the workplace. Nurs Res 1990;39(6):326–332.
22. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging New York: Pantheon/Random House; 1998.
23. Selkoe DJ. Normal and abnormal biology of the beta-amyloid precursor protein. Annu Rev Neurosci 1994;17:489–517.
24. Stockert PA. The determination of a health-promoting lifestyle in older adults Unites States: Saint Louis University; 2001. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
25. Strawbridge WJ, Wallhagen MI, Cohen RD. Successful aging and well-being: Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. Gerontologist 2002;42(6):727–733.
26. Sung HY, Cho HS. A study of successful aging model: Using the components of Rowe & Kahn. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2005;26(1):105–123.
27. William JS, Margaret IW, Richard DC. Successful aging and well-being: self-rated compaired with Rowe and Khan. Gerontologist 2002;42(6):727–733.
28. Won YH. Current status and activation plan of church welfare programs for the aged. J Korean Soc Welf Adm 2003;5:143–166.

Article information Continued

Table 1

General Characteristics of the Subjects (N=257)

Table 1

Table 2

Mean of the ADL, Self-efficacy, Physical activity, Cognitive Function (N= 257)

Table 2

Table 3

Difference of ADL, Self-efficacy, Physical Activity, Cognitive Function by General Characteristics (N=257)

Table 3

Table 4

Correlations among Variables

Table 4