-
The Effects of Emotional Labor and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment in Staffs by the Size of Facility
-
Hye Young Jang, Eun Ok Song, Yu Jin Suh
-
J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2020;31(1):1-12. Published online March 31, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2020.31.1.1
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing organizational commitment of staffs according to the size of long-term care facility. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed. Data collection was conducted for a total of 315 employees in long-term care facilities located in Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Gyeongbuk, and Chungnam. Data were collected from July 2018 to October 2018 using questionnaires which included emotional labor, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and general characteristics. In order to confirm the differences in the size of the facility, the facilities with less than 30 beds, those with 30-99 beds, and those with more than 100 beds were analyzed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and multiple regression. Results The job satisfaction and organizational commitment were significantly different according to the size of long-term care facility. Organizational commitment was influenced by ‘external job satisfaction’ in less than 30 beds, was influenced by ‘external job satisfaction, and attentiveness to required display rules of emotional labor’ in 30~99 beds, and then was influenced by ‘type of job, and internal job satisfaction’ in more than 100 beds. The predict variables accounted for 23.0%, 41.0%, and 34.0% of organizational commitment respectively. Conclusion These findings show that tailored interventions should be provided depending on the size of facility in order to increase organizational commitment. In addition, organizational commitment programs should be developed by considering strategies to reduce the emotional labor and to increase job satisfaction.
-
Predictors of Health-related Quality of Life among Spouses of Older Adults with Dementia in the Community-dwelling
-
Hye Young Jang, Song Yi Han
-
J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2019;30(4):518-527. Published online December 31, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2019.30.4.518
-
-
2,041
View
-
13
Download
-
3
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing health-related quality of life among spouses of older adults with dementia based on an ecological model. METHODS This study used data from the 2015 Korean Community Health Survey with the subjects of 541 spouses of older adults with dementia. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, ANOVA, and hierarchical multiple regression. RESULTS In this study, 26.5% of quality of life was explained by employment status, physical activity, perception of stress, perception of depressive symptom, self-rated health status, self-rated oral health status, and contact with neighbors. CONCLUSION To develop more effective nursing intervention for improvement of quality of life, it needs to consider not only the individual system related factors but also community system related factors including contact with neighbors.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Mental Health Status among Individuals with Spouses Residing in Long-term Care Facilities: Using Propensity Score Matching
Hyeon Sik Chu, Dasom Kim Journal of Korean Academy of psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2023; 32(4): 463. CrossRef - Caring Experience of Spouse Caregivers of Persons with Alzheimer's Disease: A Qualitative Study
Jin-Hee Lee, Gwi-Ryung Son Hong Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2022; 24(3): 257. CrossRef - Effect of Perceived Stress on Health-Related Quality of Life among Primary Caregiving Spouses of Patients with Severe Dementia: The Mediating Role of Depression and Sleep Quality
Jinheum Kim, Eunjeong Cha International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(13): 7962. CrossRef
|